评论太多，网页在IE下有点儿卡。新开一桌，大家继续。
来这儿的朋友很热情，还有替俺回答问题帮俺维持秩序的，辛苦了。俺希望各方朋友敞开怀说，校委公报不也提倡兼听则明偏听则暗嘛。
俺给总结一下前面的争论。支持被告方透露了原告的几条控告，大意是HU／LIU抱怨ZHU董等剥夺了他们直接进董事会的权力。同时被告方还翻出去年HU／LIU参选时不自动进董事会的宣言，以此攻击HU／LIU没有诚信，私心恋权而反新校章告四董。
支持原告方反驳对方为什么不敢透露原告所有的控告，并坚称HU／LIU绝不是报私怨而告四董，而是运用法律把学校拉回正常运行轨道。他们认为以HU／LIU人品怎么选最后都能进董事会，而且学校需要他们进董事会，并喊出只有胡/刘进入董事会，才能改变董事会分裂的格局，领导学校走出危机。
有人提议先根据老校章选校长，保证学校下学年正常开学。就目前状况下，这个提议可行吗？下学年能正常开学吗？
另外，被告四董对控告尚未作出任何反应。ZHU董吃了秤陀铁了心。HE董据说孩子都毕业了，去年指挥交通走运进了董事会，现在奶奶个熊倒惹上了官司。ZHENG董小心翼翼思前想后，HUANG董从不现身极不靠谱。他们还能绑一起吗？ 下一步会是什么动作？
ZHU董也是让背后一堆黑手推着走，身不由己。 很多东西全是别人代笔。
ReplyDeleteHUANG董小孩今年毕业。明年学校有多乱她也不在乎。
HE董孩子去年就毕业了，今年学校有多乱他也不在乎。
ZHENG董小心翼翼思前想后，凡事只会说“illegal". 鞋子湿了，想不想掉水里尚未可知。
The four board members don't necessarily have to be bound together. Each board member's role was different in the whole thing and each board member's responsibility/blame should also be different. Most of the violation was committed by Zhu Li. If I were the other three, I would get my own lawyer to give the blame to the others, or try to settle on my own. Since the four of them don't have the same interest any more, it may not be a good idea to have one lawyer representing all four of them. Imagine what can those four say to the judge? We didn't do it? The ghost made us do it? Sorry, your honor, we know what we did was wrong, but that was necessary because what they did was evil? We were all raving lunatics so we can't be responsible for what we did? Or the other three raving lunatics did it not me! Is there any other argument?
Deletehilarious!
DeleteOr they can all blame Li Jianren, Shen zhaolin.
DeleteSure, Li Jianren and Shen Zhaolin are the real ghosts.
DeleteZhu Li got the law suite and Li Jianran is free. What a joke. Li wanted to back off so many times but Jianren pushed him so hard. Why did not Jianren get the law suit?
Delete李建仁太狡猾了。推别人上阵，自己躲在go-hxny扇风点火。
Delete俺看校章这事，关键是过程太诡异。
ReplyDelete新校章的内容有好有坏，争议其实并不太多。 可是你用一个诡异的过程硬推其过关，太不像话。如此开头，将来谁还照章办事？
ZHU董又臭又硬，凡事没商量，不让步，校方不找个地方理论理论，咋整？
* Court’s Temporary Restraining Order
ReplyDeleteThe Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Westchester has issued a Temporary Restraining Order regarding the four board members' activities related to bylaw voting. Among other things, the order says
“It is further ordered that pending the hearing on plaintiffs’ application for declaratory and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, the Court hereby temporarily (i)declares the results of the April 15 Parent Council voting committee vote to be the official voting results on the proposed amended bylaws; (ii) declares that the Rejected Bylaws failed to receive the necessary two-thirds vote to amend the School’s valid Bylaws and were therefore rejected; (iii) declares that Defendants have violated the School’s Valid Bylaws in the manner in which they sought to amend the bylaws; (iv) declares the Valid Bylaws in effect as of March 25, 2012 to be the operative Bylaws; (v) enjoins and temporarily restrains Defendants from acting pursuant to or enforcing the Rejected Bylaws; (vi) orders Defendants to perform pursuant to and comply with the Valid Bylaws; and (vii) orders Defendants to stop breaching their fiduciary duties to the School.”
法院的临时禁制令
威郡纽约州最高法院发出了一个有关四位董事在校章投票中的行为的临时禁制令。除其他事项外，临时禁制令宣布 (以下是汉语翻译，如有出入以上面英文为准。)
“这里进一步下令，在等待原告申请法庭宣告以及初步的和永久的法庭禁制之前，法院在此暂时（1）宣布4月15日家长会投票委员会的投票结果是对校章修订案的正式投票结果;（2）宣布校章修订案未能收到必要的三分之二选票因此被拒绝;（3）宣布被告在寻求通过校章修订案的过程中违反现有的有效校章;（4）宣布在2012年3月25日沿用的校章是现在有效的校章;（5）责成并暂时限制被告不得根据或执行被拒绝的校章修订案;（6）责令被告遵循并执行现有的校章;（7）责令被告停止违反其对学校应尽的受托职责”。
Does anyone know when will be the court date for both sides to appear before the judge?
Delete6/22
DeleteOk. Thanks. That means it's going to be after the election. According to the Bylaws, electon must happen
Deleteon or before 6/17.
According to the Bylaws, the fiduciary duty of the board is to have an election so parents could elect the Principal and PC Chair for next year. To comply with TRO, the Board needs to have a meeting immediately and open up the election process.
Deletehttp://hxnyforum.blogspot.com/2012/05/follow-court-orders.html
说说刘雅文胡大鹏哪一篇文章是他们自己写的？
ReplyDelete哪一篇不是别人写的？
(vi) orders Defendants to perform pursuant to and comply with the Valid Bylaws; and (vii) orders Defendants to stop breaching their fiduciary duties to the School.”
ReplyDelete根据老校章选校长，家长会长是现任董事会的职责和遵循法庭TPO必须做的。下学年能正常开学。
ZHENG董小心翼翼思前想后，凡事只会说“illegal". 鞋子湿了，想不想掉水里尚未可知。
ReplyDelete==============
最看不起的人就是郑固团，让老婆瞎搞，自己不像个男人，遇事不敢站出来，永远明哲保身。越胆小越被人欺。
流氓想让所有的人都是流氓。
DeleteHUANG董小孩今年毕业。明年学校有多乱她也不在乎。
ReplyDeleteHE董孩子去年就毕业了，今年学校有多乱他也不在乎。
================
官司烧身了也不在乎吗？还不同朱立团结起来与胡大鹏刘雅文一斗到底？
四董尽是没有头脑的人。从一开学就被李建仁和沈肇麟之流牵着鼻子走。到头来自己吃官司。他们应该找李建仁和沈肇麟之流出律师费。只可惜他们现在恐怕连像样的律师都找不到。他们应该找李建仁和沈肇麟之流算账。
Delete另外，被告四董对控告尚未作出任何反应。ZHU董吃了秤陀铁了心。HE董据说孩子都毕业了，去年指挥交通走运进了董事会，现在奶奶个熊倒惹上了官司。ZHENG董小心翼翼思前想后，HUANG董从不现身极不靠谱。他们还能绑一起吗？ 下一步会是什么动作？
ReplyDelete===================
They have to follow the court order, no other choice.
Follow the Court Orders
ReplyDeletehttp://hxnyforum.blogspot.com/2012/05/follow-court-orders.html
My bet: they will pre-screen. They are already mad, can't think clearly. there is only one thing in their mind now: fight.
DeleteIf they prescreen, they will lose more support. They will tell all parents what they did last year was only for their faction members, not for democratic principles.
DeleteHow about we start an online vote on this topic?
DeleteDo you think Zhu Li ever cared about how parents voted?
DeleteHe doesn't care about our parents and kids at all. We should impeach him.
DeleteZhu Li should resign from the board Chairman position pending the law suit. Let the Board elect a new Chairman and start the election process. We don't have time to lose. The 3 board members not involved in the law suit should call a Board meeting immediately.
DeleteAgree. The 4 board memeber should not represent our school. They, at least Li ZHu should resign. What a shame!
DeleteShameless people are Hu Dapeng and Liu Yawen. Illegally become the leader of HXNY. Messed up the school badly and make us go into another lawsuit. Very unfit as leaders of school. Should resign now!!!
DeleteWhy should the four board still be board and make decisions for the school given the current condition. They should resign.
ReplyDeleteWhy should we impeach them?
Because they are not proven quilty yet. TRO just to prevent them to do further harm to the school.
DeleteI would support the impeachment. But now it may not be necessary. We just need to follow the Bylaws for a smooth leadership transition before the academic yearend. Let the court case play itself out.
如果他们还有点廉耻之心，就应该自己辞职。
Delete如果他们还有点廉耻之心，就应该自己辞职。
Delete---
Guess they don't.:)
Let's start the impeach process.
Delete下一步会是什么动作？
ReplyDelete===================
They have to follow the court order, no other choice.
-----形式明朗化了, 预计郑/贺出董事会,胡/刘进董事会. 胡董事长, 绝对票数5:2一统江湖. 林/尹如愿执掌新领导班子. 由于郑董有丰富修改ByLaw经验,被吸收到BAC,在和谐社会中偶尔发点杂音.
由于郑董有丰富修改ByLaw经验,被吸收到BAC,在和谐社会中偶尔发点杂音.
Delete----
哈哈哈，您太逗了！
他可以提供些反面教材。
Delete唉。 同样一堆人，去年明知五董做事合法，却偏要不依不饶地折腾下去。今年明知他们自己的行为违法，却也偏要不依不饶地折腾下去。
ReplyDeleteShameless people are Hu Dapeng and Liu Yawen. Illegally become the leader of HXNY. Messed up the school badly and make us go into another lawsuit. Very unfit as leaders of school. Should resign now!!!
ReplyDelete请你对这法官去呐喊。
Delete他们还能绑一起吗？ 下一步会是什么动作？
ReplyDelete--------这完全看新ByLaw投票的合法性，具体说就是抱票箱回家和票数是不是合法。其中票数非常重要，如果真有２５９张赞成票，现在整个＞２５９家长的联名信证明投过支持票，上法庭还是有说服力的。如果四董自己都稀里糊涂，那没法绑一起，下一步就投降吧。
The process of SVC voting was illegal. 抱票箱回家和票数是不是合法 are just details. The ballot was even illegal, that's another detail. Those people manning the illegal voting on 4/15 were not even on the list of the SVC members announced by Zhu Li a week after 4/15 was yet another detail. Who were involved in the initial partial mailings of ballots? Who were involved in the partial mailings of ballots on 4/16 (some members recieved ballots with postmark on 4/16)? Who picked up envelops from the Chappaqua PO Box? Who held the ballot box at home? These were also details. How many ballots they received on 4/15? How many they received after 4/15? How many envelops they kept to verify membership of HXNY? If the judge is interested in details of the illegal SVC voting, 四董have lots to answer for. Any half truth is contempt to court!他们还能绑一起吗？
DeleteWho designed and printed illegal ballot? Li Jianren?
DeleteI think sooner or later, he would get called to court to answer questions. Be careful with your go-hxny Mr. Li. Do not try to delete anything. I don't think the judge would like the fact that Chairman of BAC running an anonymous website and use it for personal attacks against people who expressed opinions about the new Bylaws draft.
fraud and forgery, those are serious offenses.
ReplyDelete不知四董的律师是否诚实地告诉他们事情的严重性。
DeleteThey probably did not tell their own lawyer all the facts. If the lawyer finds out in court that they only told him partial facts, you bet he will dump them in no time.
Delete华夏今天的混乱，四董和李建人负有全部责任。如果李建人能够公开透明没有私人目的地该校章，5年10年以后，大家都还会赞叹他的视野和眼光。但是他狭隘的心胸和短浅的目光让他把该校章的过程变成了他排除不同意见，打击异己的战场，把严肃的校章变成了他个人打击报复的武器，整个修改的过程充满了对不同意见的人身攻击，最后又试图用非法的手段浑水摸鱼地通过校章，自己最终成为了人们的笑料，历史上他为华夏做的贡献都被他的短视掩盖，华夏辛苦积攒的一万多储蓄金也就这样被他浪费。四董在行使董事会职权的时候就没为学校利益着想，满眼满心都是报仇，黄莺是做过校长的，但是在处理华夏的事情上，牺牲了全校学生的利益，只为自己的朋友拼命，这是你曾经的“齐身，治国，安天下”的理想吗？整个过程黄莺的表现出的眼光犹如街边的泼妇大妈，实在是悲哀。如果黄李两个人能多少有一点点眼光，华夏的历史都会不同。老郑，就不用说了，冲冠一怒为红颜，为了老婆能丧失一切原则的男人也很珍惜。朱董血气方刚，就是缺少一点头脑，随便被李建人利用，出了问题，李跑了，他自己扛着。贺董最冤， 孩子都不在了，还每周来打架，充当活体proxy. 你的时间花得值得吗？
ReplyDelete好歹人花了不少功夫，不要说得一无是处。大多数人不了解也不关心新BYLAW，赞成的是拉的票，反对的也是拉的票！开饭馆的不好意思只好又投赞成票又投反对票。
Delete打仗的也就十几个人，一方借新BYLAW之名让另一方下台，另一方借批新BYLAW之名要继续当权，就看谁能忽悠广大群众了。校方天时地利搞到人和，董方没这先天条件只好抱票箱回家了。
Exactly, nothing wrong with the new ByLaw. Hu/Liu hate it coz they would not be board members automatically if new ByLaw passes.
Delete早说了，新bylaws好不好，你不能搞非法程序来硬推。从伪造董事决议推出SVC开始，一直就用不法手段操作。既使新bylaws好到天边，你也不能硬来。
Delete说来说去，打来打去，你们双方到底想要什么? 抱着枝节问题不放，保面子工程，傻不傻啊?
Delete面上一个四人帮，朱郑黄贺，背后一个四黑手，沈戴田周，
Delete去年再怎么说，也没有谁把票箱抱回家。今年这四董可好，投完票把票箱抱回家，两星期后再开票。谁寄票都写在信封上。太下作了吧?
Delete也是，这次开个头，往后什么票箱都往家里抱，还了得?
Delete学习的最高境界:悟。
ReplyDelete做人的最高境界:舍。
生活的最高境界:乐。
修炼的最高境界:空。
交友的最高境界:诚。
人生的最高境界:静。
爱情的最高境界:容。
微博的最高境界:转。
学习的最高境界:悟。
ReplyDelete做人的最高境界:舍。
生活的最高境界:乐。
修炼的最高境界:空。
交友的最高境界:诚。
人生的最高境界:静。
爱情的最高境界:容。
微博的最高境界:转。
胡刘的最高境界：斗。
一开学，朱董忙着开公开董事会，让其支持者可以有机会大声嚷嚷。然后，开动宣传机器，反马力平。反马力平反不动了，转而反美洲华语。胡校被逼的没办法了，就让家长 对教改投票，朱力马上跳出来说他最喜欢的两个字：非法！接下去伪造董事会决议，4/15 SVC投票打擂台，最后一招，伪造董事会决议，要学校为其非法行为买单。
Delete这其间，鼓动一小帮吹鼓手给自己打气造势，一会公开信，一会联名信，一会喊冤信，一会恐吓信...层出不穷...
斗，那是四董及其一小撮人的最高境界！
+++++++ 胡大鹏和刘雅文状告四位董事 +++++++
ReplyDeleteMay 19, 2012
尊敬的各位家长，
5月15日,胡大鹏和刘雅文以个人并试图以中文学校的名义，把我们四位董事包括董事长告到法庭，并申请了临时禁止令(TRO)。他们要求取消董事直选，撤消新校章。
在他们的状词里,胡大鹏和刘雅文声称:
* 在过去的一年里，他们一直期盼进董事会
* 他们控告四位董事以新校章剥夺了他们自动直接进入董事会的权益. 董事普选会为他们带来不能弥补的伤害
* 四位董事排挤他们是为了能继续留任董事职位
* 普选将造成本校校长空置，明年开学将有问题
我们四位董事早声明过，我们都不会竞选连任，全体主要校领导，要由家长自由选举。对我们的攻击是没有根据的。我们期待着选出新鲜血液，让学校尽快结束混乱。我们相信这也是家长们的愿望。
这是一年内中文学校第二次卷入诉讼。去年6月，为中文学校服务十余年的前校长，教务长和十位家长被几位董事送上法庭。现在，我们四人被胡/刘聘用同一位原告律师再度送上法庭。我们都是学校的无偿志愿者，胡大鹏和刘雅文的诉讼对我们个人造成了伤害，是不公正的。
法院预期将在6月底对新校章的前途作出决定。在此之前，董事会将按照2010版Bylaws的规定，安排学校重要事项，包括校长和家长会长选举。
尊敬的各位家长，中文学校已经经不起这样的折腾了，我们恳请你们的支持和帮助，让学校能顺利交接，渡过难关。
纽约华夏中文学校董事会
董事长： 朱立
董事： 黄莺、郑顾团、贺力大
-----------------------------------------------
Hu/Liu Filed Lawsuit against Board Members
May 19, 2012
Dapeng Hu and Yawen Liu filed a lawsuit, on May 25, 2012, in their own names and supposedly in the name of Huaxia Chinese School New York as plaintiffs against four board members (including the Board Chairman) and obtained a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to demand cancellation of upcoming general election and nullification of the amended bylaws.
They claimed that:
* Their rights of obtaining the scheduled Board of Director membership is deprived by 4 board members and the amended bylaws.
* If the Board membership general election is held, they will suffer immediate irreparable harm.
* The current 4 board members seek to deprive their benefit in getting automatic Board membership and also enable themselves to continue serving on the Board of Directors themselves.
* The school will end-up without Principal over the summer recess and cause harm to school preparation for the fall.
As they stated in their law complaint: "Mr. Hu and Ms. Liu took office a year ago" "with the expectation that they would become directors at the completions of the current school year". The new bylaws "would deprive them of those positions, and would also result in the ouster of at least two other directors whose terms are not scheduled to expire this year"
It is clear now on their strong refusal in accepting the changes proposed by Bylaws Amendment Committee on elected Board membership. Apparently Dapeng and Yawen Liu have forgotten the promises they made during the campaign and after they took over the office (see the emails below). Which are:
* Abolishes the system that principal and PC Chair gain board of director membership automatically
* They surrender their rights in obtaining board of director membership automatically.
This is the second lawsuit within one year of time in our school. This year we are sued by Dapend Hu and Yawen Liu who hired the same attorney that brought lawsuit against the principal, dean, and un-named parents last year. Dapeng Hu and Yawen Liu have sued us personally (as individuals, rather than as directors of the school), even though we are unpaid volunteers, acting in good faith to promote the good of the school. We think this is unfair and burdensome on us personally.
The case will be debated on Court late June. To ensure normal school operation and on-time opening of our school next year, the Board of Directors will make important decisions on school， including the school principal and parent council chair election， based on 2010 bylaws before the Court makes the final ruling。
The school cannot sustain another round of suffering. We are sincerely asking your full support and help to pull through this difficult pass.
Chairman of the Board of Directors: Li Zhu
Members of the Board of Directors: Ying Huang, Gutuan Zheng and Lida He
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
形式明朗化了, 预计郑/贺出董事会,胡/刘进董事会. 胡董事长, 绝对票数5:2一统江湖. 林/尹如愿执掌新领导班子. 由于郑董有丰富修改ByLaw经验,被吸收到BAC,在和谐社会中偶尔发点杂音.
Delete------哈哈，林／尹执掌没戏了。郑／贺也可能出不了董事会，权利重新分配。
四董prescreen后校长后选人：林／尹执掌没戏了
Delete郑／贺也可能出不了董事会：？？？
这封信就是不提实质问题。还是想让人相信他们会赢的。
Delete四董公平主持校长家长会长选举，最后的结果可能是胡／刘为了自己进董事会放弃为他们摇旗呐喊的同志。
Delete最后的结果可能是胡／刘为了自己进董事会放弃为他们摇旗呐喊的同志。
Delete--
还想挑拨离间？你们什么脏事不会做？
大家就等着看四董如何公平了。
Well, this letter deserves to be shown to the judge and let him decide if it's in compliance with TRO.
DeleteI advise the four board members to consult your own legal consul before you do or say anyting in public. Don't be stupid.
Obviously, the four board members do not know what is Fair-play and Good Faith. If you try to accuse Hu/Liu wrong-doing, you should publish their whole complaints, not just pick and choose a few points.
DeleteWhat Hu/Liu put into their complaint obviouly had been consulted with their lawyer. The points in the complaint may not necessarily what they wanted but what are the most effective in the court of law to win the law suit.
很奇怪，李盛京去年也是这样做的。同样你们这组人，怎么没看出问题来？今年就又上纲上线，打上法庭。
Delete造假，欺骗的，是不敢上法庭的。
Delete敢上法庭的，手里都是有对方违法的证据的。
李盛京去年没有像今年朱力这样。
四人帮董事发的这个东西，中文和英文还不一样，又玩什么花招？中文版也应该翻成英文给法官看看。在法庭禁止令下，他们还攻击胡/刘，损害胡/刘的声誉。闭口不谈他们自己对学校造成的伤害。
DeleteHu et al vs Zhu et al
DeleteMay 15, 2012
the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Westchester.
Court record can be found here
http://wro.westchesterclerk.com/legalsearch.aspx#
今天学校很热闹，三五成群，有声讨的有抱怨的还有发传单的。大家讲讲见闻吧。
ReplyDelete小z到impeach桌前视察。
Delete我也去看了一下。弹刻朱立只有12人签名。
Delete他们是：
王亮
尹永义，
毛文琦
黄岳
徐珉
马捷
徐刚
陆文元
刘艳芳
堪丛菊
洪波
游忠庆
去年弹李盛京，仨小时签了200个名字。
Delete今年弹朱立，仨小时签了12个名字。哈哈。。。
今天学校很热闹，三五成群，有声讨的有抱怨的还有发传单的。大家讲讲见闻吧。
ReplyDelete路人甲说，新校章虽有可取之处，但也不能走违法程序，硬性过关。
Delete路人乙说，无论如何，学校要依法行事。不能说要通过一个更好的法，就可以违法行事。
一个人最好的样子就是平静一点，哪怕一个人生活，穿越一个又一个城市，走过一个又一条街道，仰望一片又一片天空，见证一次又一次别离。然后在别人质疑你的时候，你可以问心无愧地对自己说，虽然每一步都走的很慢，但是不曾退缩过。
ReplyDelete怎么老有人喜欢在网上抄东西？
Delete有人总是用志愿者来标榜自己，好像只要是志愿者，就可以不守法，不论他们怎么做，做什么，别人都不可以去法院告他们。
ReplyDelete可是大家有没有想一想，如果有人任意妄为，知法犯法，伪造欺骗，而不受到任何惩罚，那么将来还有何人会守法? 制定各种法规还有何用?
假如一个学校的董事长带头知法犯法，伪造欺骗，他还配继续担当这个学校的董事长吗? 我们这样一个中文学校，难道不应该有一个道德稍微高尚一些的人来领导吗?
如果无偿志愿者就可以知法犯法，那么这个世界上可能就再也不会缺志愿者了。
Delete如果一个人用他有一个好的出发点来来解释他的犯法行为，那么走私犯就可以说他自己的出发点是搞活经济，杀人犯可以说他的出发点是打击坏人，独裁者可以说他要搞好治安，强奸犯甚至可以说他要让对方受一下性教育，
四董知法犯法，就该滚蛋。
李生精，周清，莱明辉知法犯法，伪造欺骗，他们还配继续担当这个学校的董事吗？
ReplyDelete胡大鹏刘雅文知法犯法，伪造欺骗，他们还配继续担当这个学校的领导吗？就该滚蛋！
我们这样一个中文学校，难道不应该有道德稍微高尚一些的人来领导吗?
四董以为他们在董事会中占多数，他们就可以为非作歹，为所欲为。殊不知，校章中明确规定，董事会议，至少五人参加，才可做出决议。这种规定，就是要限置四董这种帮派体系。
ReplyDelete在美国国会，也有类似机制，叫filibuster. 就是说，一个党派，既使在参议员占有59%的席位，他们也不可以任意推行各种法律。如果他们一意孤行，少数派可以用filibuster 来阻止。
这就是为什么Scott Brown赢得麻州参议员席位后，全美共和党一片欢腾。
再看四董，为了推行他们的主张，置校章于不顾，不惜违法，以伪造和欺骗的手法，强行通过新校章。
在他们眼里，哪里还有法制与民主? 长此以往，难道任何一个董事会的多数派，都可以像你们一样无法无天了吗?
你们全该滚蛋了。
《西游记》里对人世的调侃很多。例如，孙悟空打死了人（其实是妖精），唐僧惊慌失措，连骂（大意）：“你这猴子，你爹又不是当官的，你胆子也太大了吧！我们也没钱打官司，还是赶紧跑吧！” 又一例：唐僧师徒到了西天，虔诚下拜，可是雷音寺里的高级和尚居然不搭理他们。原来，佛祖也见钱眼开，希望下面的人孝敬孝敬呢。
ReplyDelete有读者总结：“《西游记》告诉我们，有关系的妖怪都被领导捞救走了，没关系没后台的妖精都被打死了。”
郭刚到底要干什么?
ReplyDelete直到五董事把汪校长和蔡教务长告上法院，本人自以为是学校二派系各自拉帮结派，说来说去都是内部矛盾，毕竟都是无偿志愿为学校工作，抢来抢去的只是一份“为人民服务”的苦差事而已。不料事情竟然闹到了法院，再回头看看每一个事件与转折，顿然发现这件事情不简单。隐隐中感觉有一个黑手在幕后掌控，有一个利益在前后贯穿。在罢免五董事的最后关头，这位黑手终于控制不住，从幕后跳到了前台… 您也许已经猜到了，他就是五董事之首，郭刚。
校长选举其实只是一个导火线而已。按正常的董事换届，今年郭刚与杨董离任，而由现任校长及家长会长进入新的一届董事会。但是，郭刚由于“未尽事宜” 不愿离任，竟以他一个人的利益把15年的华夏，600多位学生，1000多位的家长们卷入了2011年春夏之交的这场动乱。郭刚是整个事件的总导演。以下是对于整个过程的分析。事先声明，个别素材有个人推理因素，还未经严格校核。您如有怀疑，最好自己再想想…
1. 雷董原本好好地做他的董事，本无心再任校长一职。在郭的一再吹捧下，雷感觉渐好。再有其它几位董事助阵，他已视校长之位是囊中之物。如雷做了校长，谁会弥补这董事会的空缺？根据bylaws，应是今年离任的郭刚。
2. 家长一致反对董事会5/22的决定，校委会，家长会想以家长的投票来迫使董事会撤回决定。郭刚搞来了一份至今来历不明的律师信，威吓家长。校委会无奈临时改成了家长意向调查。雷董仍是校长的唯一候选。
3. 第一次弹劾李董事长的投票倒是进行得顺顺利利。李董事如果下台，郭刚留任董事的几率更大，他乐得顺水推舟。没有人去法院，除了几个领导意图未完全领悟的，甚至都没有人出来阻挠。
4. 倒李失败后，民意要求二队竞选的呼声日高，郭刚意识到雷任校长的概率开始降低。他做了一件常人无法，也不敢想象的事：铲除汪元。他的目的很明确，汪进不了董事会，那董事会的一席就还是他郭董的。为了以防万一，郭刚当即找了律师准备起诉汪。
5. 家长联名要去除五董倒是郭刚未曾料到的。郭刚索性一不做二不休，把蔡一起告上，加了个restraining order以确保最后一周的家长罢免大会开不成。
6. 汪校长被辞职后，按bylaws董事会应从副校长中指定一人为校长。这一决定至今未见任何董事提及。因为一旦指定后，副校长可以进入董事会，郭刚等于白搞了汪元。
在事件最初的几周内，有许多华夏前辈们多次出面调停。但只要解决方案不能保证郭刚继续留任都遭到他的否决。郭刚甚至明确表示他的留任意向，至少二年。更值得一提的是，现在的bylaws正是郭刚上任董事后与他的律师朋友执意修改成如今这样。董事会的权利从那时起已是至高无上的了。
以下的例子是2005年和现行Bylaws的众多改动中的几个：
From 2005 Bylaws: # 6.01.1 The Board consists of seven Directors who must have general membership and are approved by the General Membership meeting to hold a maximum of four year term. 在现行 Bylaws中关键的” approved by the General Membership meeting”一条没有了！
2005 Bylaws: - #12.02 The Board of Directors shall interpret the Bylaw in its application. Final interpretation of the Bylaw shall belong to the General Membership. 现行 Bylaws中第二句去掉了。家长的权力哪去了???
整个事件的推敲中，仍有几点疑问百思不得其解，还望明白人指点迷津：
1. 董事会其余几人为何如此甘愿令郭刚排布？是为看病不花钱？OCA的优秀学生名额？还是有其它把柄捏在了郭董手里？
2. 郭刚为何非要在董事会里再赖上几年？为了中文学校的二十多万？为了圆他几年前买地办Chinese Community Center的美梦？
3. 整个事件很有点政治斗争的色彩，郭董背后还有更高的高手指点吗？
郭刚的下一步会是什么? 投票倒董仍有一周的时间，让我们来猜猜郭刚下一步可能的打算吧：
1. 继续通过律师恐吓威胁家长大会的投票。甚至会采取如上次一般的极端行为。
2. 弹劾并罢免朱会长。这又是违反bylaws的，可能性不大，但以郭刚的手段，也难说。
3. 继续拖延或阻挠提名副校长接任校长一职，让董事会留有空缺。
4. 开始针对曾经的同盟下手，逼现有董事让位与他。以郭刚的品行，眼都不会眨。
有一些家长认为罢免闹得太凶，应该与董事们再谈谈。如果是对一件事的看法不一致，工作方法的不认同，那么我会同意这些家长们的观点。但如果一个人为一己之利，践踏人权，胡作非为，你们对他还有希望吗? 还有更多的家长都抱着无所谓的态度，希望以上的陈述能让你意识到事件的严重性。郭刚需要有这么一个几百个学生的庞大资源为他个人的目的服务。事实证明他会为此不择手段，不惜牺牲他人和中文学校。而华夏的将来将会取决于郭刚的目的是什么，他何时能达到他的目的… 这次事件不是郭刚之流所说的二派之争，说俗了是正义和邪恶之争。有家长贴了下面这句，很贴切地概括了我们面临的危机： “Evils prevail when good men fail to act!” 听从你的良知吧
胡／刘背后黑手还是这个郭钢， 心狠手辣再次把学校志愿者告上法庭。那个君就郭的律师。
Delete那个Berg君就是郭的律师。
Delete什么逻辑！难道郭是所有请Berg律师的人的背后黑手吗？
Delete哪个律师厉害就请哪个！
你们是不是见了这个Berg君就怕呀。
风起云涌的罢免胡大鹏刘雅文运动马上就要开始。
ReplyDelete世界是你们的，也是我们的。胡刘你们撒流氓手段，我们会让你们吃不了兜着走！！！走着瞧。。。一切与人民为敌的反动派一定会被赶下台。你们蹦跶不了几天了。4天，是你们剩下的期限！！！
谁是反动派，这是个问题。
DeleteI am HuDapeng's fan. But think Hu Dapeng did the stupidest thing in the world. Guogang sued Alan Wang last year. but Alan is 软骨头，so Guogang won. However, the 4 directors are not 软骨头. they are 硬骨头， they are not going to emergency rooms, they will eat well and sleep well because they represent justice and they are not selfish, and they have 259 supports. With Hu's lawsuit, this number could increase to 500. Impeach Hu'Liu is the best thing to do right now so their dream of automatically enter the Board is forever going to be dream. I stongly recommend Hu/Liu withdraw the lawsuit because it makes no sense if the purpose just for them to enter the Board automatically at the expense of all parents and use our money to pay attorneys.
ReplyDeleteAre you really a HuDapeng's fan?
DeleteNobody is going to use school's money.
Delete4 board members can't use school's money, they know that!
they are spreading rumors.
Hehe,such a fan, you hypocrite. You don't see anything wrong when Zhu Li cheated and committed forgery? Who cares whether the 4 are "软骨头” or "硬骨头”? Even if they are rocks, they still have to learn the need to follow the law in court.
Delete挑拨离间，散布谣言是四董及其一伙的拿手好戏。可惜用了一年多，没人再信他们了。
Delete看看胡大鹏刘雅文选校长时的承诺，再看看他们告法庭信的内容，看看还有没有人信他们？正叫人恶心！
Delete四董都没胆量把Complaint的全文公布出来，你还在这瞎吵吵什么？
Delete就是，四董事也不会像汪远一样辞职。会与家长们站在一起，与胡刘斗倒底。
ReplyDelete斗，那是四董及其一小撮人的最高境界！
Delete他们也就会窝里横。干了犯法的事，有没有律师帮他们上法庭都成问题。
Delete人不犯我，我不犯人，
Delete人若犯我，我必犯人！
法庭是你们的，也是我们的。
没人不让你打管司啊。
Delete谁在那儿嚷嚷让人撤诉的？
Forgery and fraud are serious offenses in US. Once someone is convicted of forgery and fraud, it will be on his/her record. Nowadays, every company does background check on it's employees. These conviction will show up in the background check and be considered serious by any employer.
ReplyDelete伪造和欺骗，是性质严重的犯罪。一旦它们出现在公司学校对其雇员所作的背景调查中，麻烦就大了。
So far it's just a civil case and the goal is to obtain a permanent injunction. I don't think there will be a conviction. However, depending on how the 4 board members behave in court, it could become a criminal case eventually. We'll just have to wait and see.
DeleteHu/Liu has lied in many places in the lawsuit. It will become a criminal case against them if they continue to lie to the attorney and eventully to the court!
Delete对如何管理中文学校有不同理念，与用非法手段推行帮派理念，有着本质的区别。
ReplyDelete纵观去年和今年两场官司，它们既有不同，又有类似。
有着惊人类似的地方是，被告都是在用非法手段来推行其帮派理念和利益。
去年，五董在校章给予的合法权限内作出对中文学校有益的决定（去年以来的事实证明如此)。那些帮派代表不能善罢甘休，以种种非法手段大闹特闹。
今年，眼看在董事会决议批准的唯一合法的投票中败局已定，以四董为首的帮派以伪造欺骗为手段，违法推动非法投票和选举。
总之，这些帮派分子，不是弱智（法盲) 就是恶棍（知法犯法)。难道我们还能让这些弱智或恶棍来继续搞乱搞垮我们的学校吗?
是可忍，孰不可忍！
中国人多数是事不关己高高挂起。有的人给他票还会投，有的票拿到手里也懒得投。华人总的来说对社区和社会的参与意识薄弱，很多人来美国多年甚至从没投过票。四董和他们的帮派分子就是吃准了这一条，所以敢在学校里胡作非为。去年我也不想介入，开始对5董的决定也不理解。是7.17弹劾5董让我终于明白，闹事的帮派分子是一群无视法律，无视民主原则的人。一年来他们的种种表现让越来越多的家长认清了他们的真面目。一次次投票，支持帮派的票数越来越少。但是要大多数人团结起来，采取主动行动弹劾四董，很多人可能还是不愿意出头。特别是去年受了帮派分子鼓动，开始支持弹劾，后来发现受骗了的家长，现在更不愿意再参与弹劾签名。所以要阻止帮派分子的非法行为，上法庭是最有效的办法。也是对学校正常运作影响最小的办法。
Delete