Thursday, May 3, 2012

人生如戏



人生如戏,中文学校发生的一切和现代京剧演得真正相似


帷幕打开,灯光亮。 家长会数票现场,117票赞成180票反对否决新BYLAWHU校长LIU会长和LIZHOU董热烈握手,齐声高唱:
今日痛饮庆功酒
赶俺下台门没有
来日方长显身手

校董还要坐三秋。。。呕奥呕-奥呕
哈哈哈哈。。。一众人散去。


灯光变暗,布景转一户人家。碎花小红袄蓝色七分裤,胸前一根长辫手抱投票箱,铁梅上。(唱)【西皮流水】:
我家的票数数不清,
天天信使来登门。
虽说是,虽说是天天又不相认,
可他比亲眷还要亲。
老师和家长齐声唤点票,
这里的奥妙我不说你也能猜出几分。
铁梅激动高呼,新校章通过了!由于用力过猛假发脱落,露出光头,哈原来是ZHU董事长。


布景又变,一群身着浅灰军装头戴八角军帽的娘子军出现在HSK考场。她们有的猫着腰有的葡前行,领头的是ZHENG女士还有LI老师,好象还有哦也---小弟!她们发出轻轻的怒吼:
向前进,向前进
战士的责任重妇女的冤仇深
古有菜小弟弹劾上法庭
今有娘子军骂的就是您

娘子军下场,从舞台另一头HU校疾步走上,后跟校委家委无数人。大家也是浅灰军装八角军帽的武装打扮。HU校叫道:同志们,暴风雨就要来了!接着唱道【唢呐西皮导板】:
要学那泰山顶上...阿啊...一青葱!
众人:(边舞边齐唱)要学那泰山顶上一青葱,

不能成菜摆盘中。三千里风光看不够,十几斤粪水长更疯!

音乐响起,众人造型,灯光转暗,远处传来阵阵雷声。

46 comments:

  1. 哈哈。有意思。铁梅家有多少票到现在还没数清?信使叔叔还登门吗?

    ReplyDelete
  2. 尊敬的董事会:
    看到“辱师门”一事继续发酵,我希望董事会尽快给家长一个调查报告,浇灭目前加剧的人身攻击,净化校园环境。

    在董事会得出正式结论以前,我想指出几个关键点:
    1)张教务长未与当事双方核实之前,草草发出newsletter, 这种举动缺乏程序正义。
    2)张教务长的指控有夸大之嫌。
    他对郑琦的指控有两条:扰乱课堂秩序;侮辱老师人格。他发给老师的newsletter, 重点在“学校坚决捍卫老师人格”,让老师们觉得很安慰。不过,我读了焦世强老师的证词,发现“辱师门”根本是子虚乌有,原来郑琦“骂”的是另一个家长,而不是焦老师。 因而,学校后来的newsletterl只剩下一条含糊的指控:”扰乱课堂秩序。”
    现在周菁董事站出来“主持公道”了,可惜周董事仅仅揪住“扰乱课堂秩序”这条指控(指控为一家之言,很难说是真相),而不谴责教务长胡乱扣帽子(比如“侮辱老师人格”就是不实指控),不谴责教务长不遵守调查程序就“提前开火”-- 这绝对是选择性失明。
    3)张教务长有“以公济私”之嫌。
    掌握公职者,就忌讳的就是“为亲循私”、“以公济私”。如果亲属夹杂在纠纷里,就要回避,请第三方裁决。可惜,张教务长在这点上,考虑欠周。
    我们清楚,这次事故源于郑琦与教务长太太唐某之间的口角,至今二人各执一词。可是,此事居然由教务长出面裁判,校委会又积极向所雇用的学生老师收集证词,这样的证词的可信度绝对令人怀疑!
    以上三点,皆能得出:张教务长确实有渎职之嫌。

    激怒我写这封信的,恰恰是张教务长事后的自我辩护。他称“没有点名”,所以不存在公开羞辱郑琦。我遗憾地看到,这场无厘头的“辱师门”,居然还玩起了语言魔术,充分表露出以“术” 整人者的阴暗居心。
    这场争端是在公开场合发生,所以“一位家长”绝对是特指,不是书本上的泛称。
    自“一位家长” 辱骂五年级老师的消息传出,家长互相打听后,得出的答案只有一个:“那个家长就是郑琦。” 所以,郑琦如果不辩护,就坐实了人家的指控。任何人遭此打击,都会为了自己的名誉而战!以“一位家长” 的术语整人,事后还自认高明,嘲笑人家“对号入座”,这不仅刻薄,而且近于无耻了。

    再谈谈4月15日的HSK考试。我认为,校委会在组织HSK考试时玩忽职守,对考试拖延负有不可推卸的责任。
    学校称这场考试的组织工作“令人满意”。真的如此吗?
    我是HSK的主考老师之一,我们六年级考试拖延的主因,不是因为换了教学楼,而是考生名单严重搞错!
    学校通知HSK是分班考试,任课老师不能监考自己的学生。于是,我在陈老师的标准班监考。他的学生在10点半之前来到教室,可是正式考试拖到快11点才开始。这是事情简要经过:我在核对考生名单时,吃惊地发现11个考生里,名字居然搞错了五个,错误率高达45%!这五个孩子,只好离开教室,另寻考场。我是主考老师,不能离开教室,可是四周不见校委会的人,只能央求走道里的家长帮忙,带这几个孩子四处去找考场。一阵混乱后,HSK考试比预定的考试时间晚了近半小时,考生对此有很意见。

    我是博览班的老师,我们班的HSK考点似乎也起了波折!林老师在我的班上监考,事后她塞给我一叠准考证,让我发还给我的学生。我发现有七张准考证,并不属于我们博览班的学生!可以想象林老师点名时,也遇到了同样的混乱!

    总之,校委会组织HSK考试时,绝非他们自称的“令人满意”。校委会通知分班考试,可是事前又没有认真核对考生名单;混乱发生后,校委会的人却不知踪影,所以监考老师只能依靠身边热心家长的帮助,来维持教室秩序。
    这就是真相,这就是4月15日HSK考场上发生的一场真实的混乱。
    鉴于董事会是监控教学工作的最高机构,我提请董事会对此进行调查。最后,我谴责那些忽视学生、忽视考场秩序,只顾围着票箱转悠的教学领导!

    六年级博览班 李晓京老师

    ReplyDelete
  3. 《最后一问:你们到底有够没够儿啊?》




    (写给“你们”,请对号入座。好鞋不踩烂泥巴,这是我的最后一封公开信。)

    你们到底有够没够儿啊?



    去年把前校长搞得心脏病突发,被推进了医院急救室;这周又公开羞辱前教务长,致使她精神重挫,病倒在家!我们的学校也倒霉透了:你们不让家长们过太平日子,宁愿学校明年继续打得稀里哗啦,也要拼命狙击新校章。君不见,连副校长都亲自披挂上场,到中餐馆连蒙带骗地拉票。家长也不傻。知道你们走后,被拉票的家长怎么评价你们的吗?说你们这帮人“不够decent! 不够decent!”

    对了,“不够decent”就是家长现在对你们的评价。

    近日,教务长张明宝谴责郑琦女士扰乱教学秩序。在管纪律的副校长介入调查之前,在未向当事双方核实之前,张明宝就连发数封newsletter给全校老师,公开羞辱前教务长郑琦。郑琦后来得知此事,悲愤交加,病倒在家。郑琦的辩护词,广大家长在newsletter里是看不到的,因为newsletter自这学年开学起,就被公器私用,成为小帮派的舆论阵地。

    郑琦自有可取之处,因为在公益学校服务数年,仅凭热情是坚持不下去的。她这样资深的志愿者,是我们学校的财富,值得尊重。可惜,你们眼里只有私怨,即便和煦春风也化解不开你们的千年之寒。不幸,我们的学校也在寒气裹挟下,因为你们霸持着学校资源。



    养子弟如养芝兰,既积学以培植之,又积善以滋润之。

    中文学校是培养华裔子弟学习传统文化之处。可是你们配称教育工作者吗?愤于你们的胡闹,有些家长打算下学年把孩子转到别的学校,其中一个说:“如果一桌饭 被人啐了一口,你还能吃得下去吗?只好离席闪人了。”去年起了风波,但良知和希望仍在。今年呢,校园里四处溅粪,不但人身攻击、造谣中伤升级,连教学质量 也大受影响。所以,我理解这些家长的选择。



    我是老师,更喜欢谈教学。

    每周日我去教室上课,看看你们在闹什么吧:挥舞两块板砖儿(马力平和美洲华语)拍人开道,使劲扩大自己的地盘。你们表面鼓吹教材多元化,可是把全校的财力物力都砸向自己抱养的小班教材,阴险地以教材来分裂家长。这是搞教育吗?这是玩政治。

    尝试新教材,确实满足部分家长的需求,因为严谨的正规教材让一些孩子望而却步。这些孩子转而去念歌谣,培养兴趣;到高年级,你们让孩子去学含拼音和英文注 释的教材,不过这套教材抽去大量人文内容,使学习中文显得隔靴搔痒,所以预定50人的试验班剩下了30个孩子(包括你们的孩子)。这个难堪的教改数据,你 们一直藏着掖着,不敢告诉家长吧?

    你们一贯偷换概念,把兴趣等同于严肃学习,吹嘘实验班“100%满意”,指称《标准中文》只有可怜的20%兴趣度。对了,你们也别光吹,能否让我测试一下那些“认”了很多字的孩子?我用同样的字写一篇文章,问问他们是否还看得明白?

    Reply

    AnonymousMay 5, 2012 07:52 AM
    中文学习是扫文盲,不是扫字盲。只知字音不知字义,也是字盲。念歌谣,会大量产生这样的字盲。某教材的卖点是少写字少写作,多念歌谣而不重视随文认字,这 种路数是浮躁的,与急功近利的社会风气有关。低年级是打基础的时候,过分突出“兴趣”,如同把基础建立在豆腐渣上。一分耕耘,一分收获,家长很清楚里面的 逻辑关系。

    我跟我们班的家长说过,认字是“点”,造句是“线”,阅读是“面”,写作才是中文学习的“体”。所以,我们《标准中文》班每两星期就要写一篇小文,家长也很配合。如果校刊《小语世界》闹稿荒,尽管去我们班的公告栏里去选取。可是我看到你们在吹嘘,说试验班的孩子毕业后,会比《标准中文》班的孩子水平高。嘴上放卫星,也就算了,可是这个主观期望,却以公文形式出现在严肃的《教材评估》里,难怪家长说你们不decent呢。你们中有人想“在两三年内彻底让《标准中文》消失”,所以现在损招儿频出。你们真的是一群见不得阳光的人啊。



    我本想安心教书,今年忍不住撰文批评你们,不光因为你们控制舆论,手法下作,也讨厌你们在中文教育上指鹿为马,把一般教材吹捧为国宝熊猫。我不反对家长选 教材,反对的是在教材上瞎忽悠。在教师会上,你们安排自己的人,霸占话筒大讲特讲,我只好以这样的形式与家长们交流了。

    不过,再跟你们谈中文教育,倒显得我迂腐。你们本来就不是一心搞教学,你们有的人一动笔就是一场悲剧,别字连篇,散不成局,活似车祸现场,惨不忍睹啊!英 文没学好,中文更差,居然还叫嚣着要培训老师。怎么不向前任学习呢?以前的校领导工作踏实,为人低调,从不自吹,也不滥花公款大搞面子工程。所以,以前的 中文学校,就没有今年这么多污七八糟的事情。

    虽然中文教学不是你们的强项,但是你们搞政治倒有一手。我听说某大佬(其孩子在《美洲华语》班)已经放了狠话,“我们就要赶走那些反对‘教改’的人!”

    难道家长反对的是“教改”这个中性词吗?不,我们反对的是浮夸的教改手法和下作的整人手段。学校现在不是放开注册了吗,你们还在以教材来吓唬家长,不太龌龊了吧?



    众所周知,这届校委会是在70%家长未参与投票的情况下,匆匆上台的。为了学校早日走上正轨,家长就不计较了。可是息事宁人的良好愿望,种下的却是一小群闹事的跳蚤。你们本来就是帮派分子,根本就不代表民意,所以开学后只能依靠伪造民意、打击异议会员、控制newsletter,冒充教育专家来误导家长。

    我是这么解读你们连蒙带骗拉来的100多张反对票的:318教学投票之时,你们拉到了300多张;反对新校章时,你们仅仅拉到100多张,流失了100多张。这说明什么呢?说明有家长已经不愿被你们利用了。你们的100多张NO,也许会继续搅乱600多会员的学校。可是这样的“赢”法,早已输掉了人心!

    以前我会说“以大局为重”,看样子已经不存在什么“大局”了。你们眼里只有小局,才不在乎有正义感的家长转校呢。哪怕学校只剩一亩三分地,你们依然会做山大王,不是吗?下次我看见你们,会称你们为“村长”、“寨主”、“副村长”、“副寨主”。

    正是你们把我们的学校矮化了,搞脏了菁菁校园。

    诚也!

    ReplyDelete
  4. 近日,259名家长对新校章说YES,表达了“民心思定”的强烈愿望。通过新校章,尽快选出新董事会、新校委会和新PTA,绝对是我校走出混乱的一条光明大道。家长们真诚地给了我校一次重生的机会,这种信任值得珍惜。可惜,个别以“和为贵”幌子上台的人,依然在破坏着学校的安定,充分暴露了他们对家长的无视和对权力的迷恋。他们竞选时,说要共同建造和谐 校园,可是我们看到的是混乱,以及分裂家长的行径。现在,他们再次做上了“讼棍”,誓把学校拉向法庭,不顾一切代价要拉下新校章,践踏广大家长的和平愿望。他们就是要确保小帮派利益,拖到下学年,让全校家长陪着他们玩,等他们认可的人上台后,再重新修改校章。

    一个教师感慨道:“每周日我去上课,他们去打架。”4月15日,为了可怜的政治利益,他们罔顾学生的安全和学业,重要的HSK考试疏于监管,陷入混乱。HSK考试本是分班进行,可是他们连考生名单都排错,致使一些孩子离开本班,在过道里奔走,四处找教室去应考。那时他们在哪儿忙活呢?在投票点,挥舞着一大把proxy大搞政治,狙击新校章出台。

    从热衷做“讼棍”危害学校团结,到试图开除建设校有功的志愿者,他们在权力的大道上一路狂奔。最新的事端,就是眼下发生的“风波亭”似的政治迫害。一名服务十年的志愿者,仅因校委会某人的一面之词,他们就连发newsletter 公开羞辱,并叫嚣着要开除她。这种粗暴的政治迫害。居然发生在公益学校,真让人惊愕!

    民心思定,我们必须阻止政客们的胡闹,唾弃损害团结的几个“讼棍”!家长朋友们,学校重建需要你。现在直选董事的工作正在酝酿中,欢迎家长积极报名参选,并提供高贵意见。附件是一个家长兼老师写的公开信。这封信虽然表达的是个人观点,但其间不乏中肯之处。

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 这几天从不同渠道收到Jie Cheng的写的民心思定的信,看了以后首先是很感动,看到Jie Cheng 这么关心我们学校,对我们学校的事物积极发表意见,觉得也要向Jie Cheng学习,发表一下自己的意见,也希望沈兆麟老前辈和其他诸位家长也把我的信寄给大家。
      我就Jie提到的两件事情讲讲想法。第一件事情是“风波亭”似的政治迫害, 首先从双方当事人的发言来看,我们可以断定的是4月15日,一位家长闯入了一个正在考试的班级, 说了少儿不宜的语言,干扰了课堂纪律。如果这位家长闯入的是Jie Cheng的教室,作为老师,Jie 是否会要求校委会严肃学校纪律呢?如果这位家长闯入的是Jie Cheng的孩子的教室,作为家长,Jie 是否希望校委会有所行动呢?就事论事,无论这位家长是谁,做出的这件事情都是严重扰乱教学秩序的事情,校委会如果不处理就是失职。
      第二件事情是关于新校章和直选董事的关系。Jie Cheng把新校章和直选董事等同起来,在概念上是不对的。如果新校章只是改了开会的10天3天的问题和直选董事的条款,恐怕全校都同意,我们新的董事早就选出来了。 但是新校章有太多的附加条款是我们这至少180个家长不能接受的。首先,新校章剥夺了家长对教材的选择权,这是我们伤害我们家长根本利益的。试用新教材,是我们很多家长的心声,但是当家长向原教务长蔡晓笛建议时,原教务长连书都不看,就七八个理由否决。现在的董事长朱力,连美洲华语都没读过,就在教师培训上否定说美洲华语没有中国历史。这些例子告诉我们家长把教材的选择权交给一小撮人是很危险的,我们来这里是学中文的,教材的选择权是我们家长要捍卫的, 不可剥夺的。 其次,新校章不仅不是限制了董事会的权力,而是加大了董事会的权力。除了董事会,全校大会,校长,家长会长都没权力了,如果我们通过“比例代表制”选出一个山头林立,天天打架的董事会,我们家长学生的利益谁能保证? 对于这个权力过分集中的校章,我们必须说不。
      搞乱学校的不是别人是四个董事。四个董事在同一天内制造第二个选举,而且选举本身漏洞百出,然后强迫大家接受他们认可的结果。首先,为什么搞两个选举?家长会的选举没有任何的问题,每一步都规规矩矩,四个董事不能因为不喜欢别人就另搞一套,事实上分裂学校,制造事端。其次,校章有如宪法,为了学校的长治久安,校章要仔细推敲,经得住时间历史检验,通过的过程要透明,公平。四个董事这样做就是忽视法律,不尊重家长,把自己的意志强加于家长,人为制造混乱了。
      的确,民心思定,校章不通过不等于学校大乱,我们可以直选校董,校长,家长会长,校章修改委员会,用更长的时间慢慢讨论校章,找到一个最符合我们家长利益的校章。急于通过现在的校章只会制造更大的混乱。
      Jie Cheng,您说呢?

      Delete
  5. 新校章是纽约华夏建校以来,修改时间最长,修改幅度最大,家长参与最多,至今最完善 (尽管不完美)的校章。在我看来,此次修改的重点是还权于广大家长,包括家长对教材的选择权.

    新校章加强了董事会的权力,也增加了董事会的责任。最重要的是理顺了董事会,校长,家长会的治理结构 (governance structure) 。这就在根本上消除/减少了纽约华夏历此动乱有两个权力中心 (董事会,校长/家长会)的根源。

    同时新校章确认家长大会是学校的最高权力机构。在纽约华夏建校以来,首次赋予家长同时选举董事会,校长,家长会会长的全面权力。

    广大家长尽可通过选举自己心仪的董事会,行使对学校管理的权力, 包括对教材的选择权.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 如果你还不知道“丧心病狂”是什么意思的话, 你只要看看如今朱郑黄贺和李建人一伙的表现就知道了。

      当你的新校章要用特殊手法来通过,包括特选的投票委员会,特设的违法票,违法特选的寄票名单,特别私密的邮箱,特别的程序,以保证新校章的通过,你就是“丧心病狂”了!

      你还有什么名誉和信誉可谈吗?

      Delete
    2. What I don't understand is why we even need a new bylaw. Why couldn't chairman Zhu just tell us who are in the new board and who is the next year's principal to save us all the trouble of election and voting? What's the point of a new bylaw when the law doesn't need to be followed anyway?

      Delete
    3. I agree. As long as Zhu Li is the Board Chairman, he can manufacture any voting result as he pleases. Just spare us the trouble.

      Delete
  6. 争什么?
    http://hxnyforum.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  7. +++++ New Bylaws Passed and Election Starts (新校章通过, 学校普选启动) +++++

    May 7, 2012

    * 新校章已由超过2/3家长投票通过
    * 即日起开始董事会, 校长, 家长会长同时直选
    * 请家长报名参选, 报名5/20/2012截止

    --------------------------------------------------------------

    Dear HXNY Members,

    The HXNY Board of Directors held a meeting in AAB 104 on 5/6/2012 and discussed the voting results of the amended Bylaws and the upcoming school election (see the Board minutes below).

    The HXNY Bylaws Special Voting Committee has completed ballot counting for the voting on the amended HXNY Bylaws. The results are:

    YES votes: 259
    NO votes: 97

    The percentage of YES votes is 73% which exceeds 2/3 of valid votes. Pursuant to Article 5.03.3 of the current HXNY Bylaws, the Board hereby declares that the amended HXNY Bylaws takes effect immediately (新校章已由超过2/3家长投票通过).

    We are attaching a copy of the amended HXNY Bylaws (the new Bylaws) for your reference.

    We would like to express our sincere thanks to the Bylaws Amendment Committee for their dedication, professionalism, and selfless work in the past eight months. We also thank the school administration, PC and all HXNY members for their contributions to the Bylaws amendment.

    HXNY members have spoken. They demanded the school to move forward with a new beginning by having an open, fair and truly contested election of the entire HXNY leadership! We urge the current school administration and PC to respect the collective will of the HXNY members. We also urge all HXNY members to unite under the new Bylaws, to seek common ground, and to bring peace and normalcy back to our beloved school.

    We recognize that a significant portion of HXNY members expressed reservations about the amended HXNY Bylaws. We respect their choices. We will do our best to earn their trust and support.

    Pursuant to the new HXNY Bylaws, the Chairman of the Board of Directors herein announces the following openings for the upcoming school election (即日起开始董事会, 校长, 家长会会长同时直选):

    Nine (9) Directors of the HXNY Board
    One (1) Principal
    One (1) Chair of the Parent Council

    All eligible voting members are encouraged to exercise your rights and step up to run for these positions to lead our school out of the current crisis and to a better future. Those, who are willing to serve, should submit petitions for their candidacies to the Board of Directors (hxnyboard@googlegroups.com), stating the position the candidate is seeking, along with a brief resume and the endorsement signatures of at least 2% of the voting members (17 members or more) by May 20, 2012 (请家长报名参选, 报名11:59PM, 05/20/2012截止). An Election Committee consisting of Board members, Admin and PC representatives and general members will be formed to facilitate the election.

    The new HXNY Bylaws mark a new beginning for our school on a journey to eventual peace and prosperity. This journey may not be a smooth sailing. But, with your support, we are confident that we can build a better future together for our children.

    Li Zhu
    Chairmanof HXNY Board of Directors

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    ReplyDelete
  8. +++++ HXNY Board of Directors Meeting Minutes+++++

    Date: 10:00 am – 12:00 pm, May 6, 2012

    Location: AAB 104

    Presented Board Members: 6
    Lida He, Ying Huang (Proxy), Shengjing Li, Gutuan Zheng, Ching Zhou, Li Zhu

    Absent Board Member: 1
    Minghui Lei

    ---------------------------------------------

    Meeting Minutes:

    The school Board discussed and passed the following resolutions:

    New HXNY Bylaw (4 yes, 2 abstain, 1 absent)

    * On April 29 the votes on the new school Bylaws were counted. There were 259 school members voted YES, 97 voted NO. 46 proxy votes were included in the counting while 17 invalid votes were excluded.

    * The 73% school members “YES’ vote on the new Bylaws exceeded the 2/3 super majority required for the Bylaws amendment, the amended HXNY Bylaws takes effect immediately.

    General Election for a Fresh Restart of the School (4 yes, 2 abstain, 1 absent)

    * The school Board calls on all school members to give our school a fresh new start with a general school election of the entire school leadership.

    * Pursuant to the new HXNY Bylaws, openings for election of HXNY 2012-2013 school leader positions are nine (9) Board of Directors, one (1) School Principal, and one (1) Chairperson of Parents Council.

    * An election committee will be constructed to administrate the upcoming school general election.

    * The nomination process will start immediately and will end at 11:59PM on May 20, 2012.

    * Eligible HXNY members, who are willing to serve, should submit petitions for their candidacies to the Board of Directors, stating the position the candidate is seeking, along with a brief resume and the endorsement signatures of 2% of the voting members.

    School Legal Advisory (4 yes, 2 abstain, 1 absent)

    * The Board will reserve the right to seek legal advice.

    Volunteer Legal Protection (4 yes, 2 abstain, 1 absent)

    * In case of the school internal and external personal(s) suit against HXNY volunteers, the school shall exercise the Bylaws indemnification terms to protect the volunteers in their defending and countersuing legal activities.

    * In the event of litigation, a school fund shall be allocated for this purpose.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 朱立有本事你去管保险公司要钱。你要敢动用学校储备金给自己打官司,我就会给District Attorney写信告你。

      Delete
    2. I don't understand why Zhu Li made up the whole board minutes without any board meeting? In addition to actions without proper authority now he committed fraud. Why did he do that? Anyone knows?

      Delete
    3. Normal people won't be able to understand his actions.
      Unless court ruling or majority parents want to remove him, there is no proper way to stop him from doing these.
      He is betting on nobody is will to go to the court or calling for impeachment, and pushed on his own agenda. He wants to make his own agenda a reality, and therefore forces others to accept it.

      Delete
    4. He is insane now. He is too consumed by his desire to
      take back the school by his faction and pays no attention to any law, rules or protocol.

      Delete
  9. ************恳请您们的支持罢免朱立,郑固团,黄莺和贺力大四位董事会委员**************

    华夏的家长们,

    近期董事委员朱立,郑固团,黄莺和贺力大借新校章投票之机, 罔顾法律规定肆意违反校章。他们的所作所为已经造成了学校混乱,严重影响学校的正常运作:
    ** 以个人喜好,随意私自更改校规法既定条文执行方式,无视校法的存在,行事方式尤如儿戏 ** 反对接纳群众意见, 否定候选人基本权力
    ** 言行不一,出尔反尔,不守承诺,不承认学校家委会合法投票结果
    ** 玩弄权势,曲解校规法
    ** 缺乏领导力量,危机处理意识和能力不足,甚至于参与鼓动搞破坏

    请华夏纽约中文学校的家长们,不要轻视了您所拥有的权力和肩上被负的义务,要参与,要行使你的权力,让中文学校朝向你们嚮往的方向去完善。
    各位家长及朋友们,为了您们的孩子和中文学校的未来,我们不能再让这几个董事为所欲为了。请来行使自己的权利投票,罢免董事会委员朱立,郑固团,黄莺和贺力大,恢复学校正常运作。

    •投票时间: 5月20日,上午9点 –12 点
    •投票地点: AAB116

    华夏纽约中文学校推动改进小组
    二零一二年五月
    Call for All Member Conference on 5/20/2012
    Dear All Fellow HXNY members,
    HXNY is a nonprofit, ultimately run by you as voters who elect the school administrators. There are many talented people who devote a lot of their time with little or no compensation for our children. Please do your part and participate in our school to bring it through this crisis. You can make HXNY a better school. Please vote. On 5/19/2012, more than 20% of all of our members signed a written petition to Remove the 4 Board Members from HXNY Board immediately. These 4 members are: Zhu Li朱立, Gutuan Zheng郑固团, Sue Huang黄莺 and Lida He贺力大. We are calling for All Member meeting on May 20,2012, to get your support to vote on Removal of these 4 Board members. The agenda will follow. Looking back at this academic year, we believe every parent was happy to see a peaceful school moving toward a nice end before the summer starts. However, these 4 members on the HXNY Board disagree with the majority of us. They formed a voting block in the Board and pre-determined their agenda that are against majority opinions. The Board has failed in their responsibilities to govern. If they are still in power, the school is without leadership when preparations, such as student registration, must be made for the next school year. The lack of effective administration and dissention threatens our school. These 4 people hijacked our school. We received many feedback and comments from you: disappointed, saddened, scared, upset, outraged... Please don't be. These 4 people are acting so out of norm, only because they believed you would not stand up to remove them soon. No matter how we feel, the only solution is to REMOVE THESE 4 BOARD MEMBERS immediately. We do not have another option.
    This is not about election; this is about bringing back the sanity, creditability and integrity to our community and leadership. We have a crisis and only a united us can help ourselves. We are calling for All Member meeting on 5/20, to get your support to vote on Removal of these 4 Board members. The agenda will follow.
    Sincerely,
    The HXNY Committee to Remove 4 Board

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 支持。去哪里签名?

      Delete
    2. 四人帮最严重的错误:校章投票作弊。严重践踏民主原则和尊严。

      Delete
    3. Absolutely support! But first of all you need 20% petition. Do you have it? If not, we could go on May 20th to sign up for a petition. And you can email all parents to solicit petition via email before May 20th. Then you'll need to give 10 days prior notice for an actual vote of removal. The notice has to specify time, date and place of voting. Please contact class parents to get the ball rolling. These four board members not only unfit to be in the board, they should be prosecuted for fraud.

      Delete
  10. 支持!不过发起人是谁?有没有20%家长签名?

    咱们可不能学小弟,去年弹劾李圣经董事长的时候,号称有185签名,可投完票只有170多票支持,连签名数都不到,丢死人了。

    请给全体家长代表发信classparents@hxcsny.org 通知全体家长具体签名方式。

    ReplyDelete
  11. Dear all,


    郑琦 has been sending e-mails to many people alleging that we told HSK4 students to be at SCI371 at 10:15am on 4/15/2012 to support her assertion that students were not supervised for 30 min. 郑琦's allegation has no factual basis. Due to classroom change on 4/15/2012, G6 students taking HSK3 had to be moved to TEC building. Because of the distance between TEC building to SCI 371, Han Ban official was unable to arrive at SCI371 from TEC by 10:30am, so we sent a parent (Tang Li) to SCI371 around 10:30am to supervise students. Attached below are my e-mail to HSK4 parents on 4/4/2012 about the test. We did not tell parents to have their kids to be at SCI371 by 10:15am. Parents were bcc'ed on the 4/4/2012 e-mail to protect their privacy.


    Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions.


    Best regards,


    Mingbao


    From: mingbao zhang
    To: "nengren@yahoo.com"
    Cc: Dapeng Hu ; Mark Yin ; Li Lin ; J. Lin
    Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 12:10 AM
    Subject: 4/15 HSK4 Test



    Dear Parents,

    Just a reminder, you have registered your child for the 4/15/2012 HSK test. The test will take place between 10:30am-12:30 pm in Room SCI371. HSK related infomation can be obtained from the school website:http://www.hxcsny.org/page.php?31. Please make sure your child has the following when he/she enters the test room:
    1. 所有考生必须携带护照或其他有照片的证件,足够的2B铅笔和橡皮, 去考试教室报到并领取准考证。
    3。考试当天被判定所持证件不合格的考生,不能入场考试。考生入场时须将手机、MP3等关闭,所有禁止物品放在书包内,并将书包放在主、监考指定的地方。

    Please note that HSK 4 is not part of the Standard Tests our students are taking on 4/15/2012 It is provided to you solely as a courtesy.

    Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions.

    Best regards,


    Mingbao



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ReplyDelete
  12. From: Dapeng Hu
    To: gutuan zheng ; "hxnyboard@googlegroups.com"
    Cc: Melissa Zheng ; Ergang Shi ; alljiao@yahoo.com; Li Tang ; pta ; adminteam@hxcsny.org
    Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2012 10:03 PM
    Subject: [adminteam:588] investigation on 4/15 incident



    Dear Board,

    Per Board members’ request, the VP of Safety and Discipline had more conversations with individuals involved in the April 15th incident of classroom disturbance. Each individual had given their statement on what happened, see below.

    基于这些调查,我们进一步确认我们上周的结论:有位家长闯进一个五年级教室,在老师和学生面前叫骂, 严重影响了老师的正常上课,也给孩子造成不良影响。我们重申请不要把成人之间的争端带进教室。不管因何种事端,任何时候,任何人都不得扰乱老师在课堂上的教学和孩子们的上课。学校的Code of Conduct 明确规定,严禁任何人故意扰乱课堂秩序。如果类似事件再次发生,我们会根据Code of Conduct 追究当事人责任。

    Ergang Shi,VP of Safety and Discipline
    Dapeng Hu, Principal

    郑琦的描述:

    “整 个事件冲突是围绕着4月十五日学校校委会光顾搞政治,没有人管理HSK4考试与学生。致使教室SCI-371里三十分钟没有老师,威胁到学生生命安危,教 室里有学生只有十到十一岁,有可能走丢,会给家长学校带来极大的损失。当我出于一位家长的责任感,出来帮忙并询问,并帮助看护了学生三十分钟,却遭到了教 务长和他夫人的漫骂与咆哮“把她赶走!”


    唐丽的描述:


    “4月15日上午,张明宝在SCI楼下遇到我,要我赶紧去371教室。他说汉办的老师正在TEC楼安排6年级的考试,安排完了,他会和汉办的老师一起到SCI371,让我先去照看一下371的学生。我立即赶到了371教室。当时大约十点半左右。到教室后,我让学生们都坐好,作些考前的准备。没过多久,郑琦出现在教室门口,看了看,然后对着我吵着要refund,她儿子是考生之一。我让她离开教室。这时候,隔壁的焦老师来到教室门口说,他班的学生要考试,请放低声音。我就把教室门关上了。然后就回到讲台上与张明宝电话联系,等他与汉办的老师到来。”


    焦老师的描述:


    “以下是4-15那天在我教室(SCI370-5年级实验班)发生的事情:
    10:28a.m., 在我准备回到教室给学生上课的时候,一位家长在门口将我拦住,问我是否是老师,当我回答她是以后,她却提出要求我去照看一下她儿子的考试班级,原因是那个 班级没有老师在。于是,我就回复她我不能,因为我有自己的班级要上课,我不能扔下我的学生们不管。随后我就进入到我自己的教室准备给学生开始期中考试。当 考试考试开始没到三分钟,隔壁的教室就传来大声的叫骂声音,我的学生们由于好奇都跑到隔壁门口去看热闹,我立刻将孩子们叫回来继续考试,随之,我走到隔壁 教师,敲门并请她们小点声争吵,因为这已经严重影响到我学生的正常考试。然后,我就回到自己的教室,当我正走进自己教室的时候,一位家长紧随我闯进了教室,并且突然大声骂道:“She is a son of bitch.” 瞬间,孩子们都愣住了。以下是我和那位家长的对话:
    家长:She is a son of bitch.
    我:Excuse me?
    家长:She is a son of bitch. 她是个女流氓,她凭什么把我从教室里撵出来?
    我:I am sorry? You are not supposed to say those words in the classroom, especially in front of these students. You need to say sorry.
    家长:I do not care. 她是个女流氓。
    我:Again, you are not supposed to say those words in front of the students.
    家长:(她向前迈了两步)你知道我是谁么?
    我:I don't care you are but you can not say those words here.
    家长:我就是前教务长,我就是dean。
    我:Ok? You need to say sorry.

    紧接着,我们学生就喊了一句:“Get out. Close the door.”

    然后我们就继续进行考试了。”



    2012/4/29 gutuan zheng

    Dapeng,
    I saw the newsletter and the complaint in the attached eMail. It is a serious matter as claimed and also a serious matter to have an issue published in the newsletter. Please provide your investigation results to the board, and explain how the decision be made to have this published in the newsletter.

    Melisas,
    Please also send in your statement to the board.


    Li Zhu,
    I'll suggest the baord shall also conduct an investigation to the matter, to understand the facts and how the decision be made to have this published in the newsleter.

    Gutuan

    ReplyDelete
  13. ***兼听则明、偏听则暗***

    对于近日在家长邮件组里流传的一些言论,校委会建议大家本着兼听则明、偏听则暗的精神,厘清事实,再下断语。

    修 改新校章,其本质在于契约精神,即追求一个公认的法规条文,每个人都遵守、尊重校章,在此基础上形成共识。然而,用破坏校章、凌驾于法律之上的手段,用搞 运动的方式,迫使全体家长接受一个充满争议的新校章,是跟重修校章的立足点背道而驰的,对于学校的长治久安是极其有害的。用违反校章、法律的手段建立的校 章,能成为今后全体家长约束自我行为的公约吗?这个悖论不解决,遑论民心,遑论安定?

    学 校的乱象,根子在于个别董事会成员凌驾于法律之上,把个人的意志、小团体的利益凌驾于全体家长的利益和学校长远发展的利益之上。学校缺乏一个民主的制度, 缺乏一个公正的权威性的声音,董事会部分成员不能履行其职责,反而成为制造混乱的推手。要制止乱象,校委会仍在以最大的克制,建议协商解决问题。但是为了 学校的利益,防止部分人士利用人心思定的心态,绑架全体家长的长期利益,校委会和家长会不排除最后诉求于法律援助。请大家看清前因后果,切勿饮鸩止渴,切勿因小失大。

    同时,校章修改的工作并不会因之停滞。我们需要的是正本清源,而不是匆忙上马,贻患无穷。请大家审慎行事,齐心协力,稳步推进校章修改和领导换届工作,务求能经得住历史考验,务求能推进华夏纽约的长治久安。

    ReplyDelete
  14. 这几天从不同渠道收到Jie Cheng的写的民心思定的信,看了以后首先是很感动,看到Jie Cheng 这么关心我们学校,对我们学校的事物积极发表意见,觉得也要向Jie Cheng学习,发表一下自己的意见,也希望沈兆麟老前辈和其他诸位家长也把我的信寄给大家。
    我就Jie提到的两件事情讲讲想法。第一件事情是“风波亭”似的政治迫害, 首先从双方当事人的发言来看,我们可以断定的是4月15日,一位家长闯入了一个正在考试的班级, 说了少儿不宜的语言,干扰了课堂纪律。如果这位家长闯入的是Jie Cheng的教室,作为老师,Jie 是否会要求校委会严肃学校纪律呢?如果这位家长闯入的是Jie Cheng的孩子的教室,作为家长,Jie 是否希望校委会有所行动呢?就事论事,无论这位家长是谁,做出的这件事情都是严重扰乱教学秩序的事情,校委会如果不处理就是失职。
    第二件事情是关于新校章和直选董事的关系。Jie Cheng把新校章和直选董事等同起来,在概念上是不对的。如果新校章只是改了开会的10天3天的问题和直选董事等无异议的条款,恐怕全校都同意。 但是新校章有太多的附加条款是我们这至少180个家长不能接受的。首先,新校章剥夺了家长对教材的选择权,这是我们所不能接受的。试用新教材,是我们很多家长的心声,但是当家长向原教务长蔡晓笛建议时,原教务长连书都不看,就七八个理由否决。现在的董事长朱力,连美洲华语都没读过,就在教师培训上否定说美洲华语没有中国历史。这些例子告诉我们家长把教材的选择权交给一小撮人是很危险的,我们来这里是学中文的,教材的选择权是我们家长要捍卫的, 不可剥夺的。 其次,新校章不仅不是限制了董事会的权力,而是加大了董事会的权力。除了董事会,全校大会,校长,家长会长都没权力了,如果我们通过“比例代表制”选出一个山头林立,天天打架的董事会,我们家长学生的利益谁能保证? 对于这个会造成学校停滞甚至混乱的校章,180名家长说不,也是出于求治求进的民心。

    其实搞乱学校的不是别人是四个董事。四个董事在同一天内制造第二个选举,而且选举本身违法违规之处不胜枚举,直接造成了两个相反的投票结果,然后他们又强迫大家接受他们认可的结果。首先,为什么搞两个选举?家长会的选举没有任何的问题,每一步都规规矩矩,四个董事不能因为不喜欢别人就另搞一套,事实上分裂学校,制造事端。校章有如宪法,通过的过程要透明,公平,家长会主办的投票完全符合这一原则,四个董事又凭什么否定这一投票,把自己的意志强加于人,人为制造混乱呢?难道用非法否定合法,以操纵选举否定公平投票就是民心所思的安定吗?

    的确,民心思定,但校章不通过不等于学校大乱,我们可以用更长的时间慢慢讨论校章,找到一个有共识的最符合我们家长利益的校章,这样才能真正实现长远的安定。急于通过现版的校章只会为将来埋下新的乱源,而试图用违法违规的手段强行通过新校章更是造成现在学校混乱的根本原因。遗憾的是在四个董事制造第二个选举的时候,他们没有想到民心思定。

    Jie Cheng,您说呢?

    ReplyDelete
  15. 团结起来,保护学校


    华夏经历十六年的风风雨雨, 发展到今天这样的六百个学生,近千名家长的规模,这里凝聚了无数义工的心血和汗水。团结奉献是华夏的脊梁。来在广大家长和老师大力支持下,校委会、家长会这一年兢兢业业,积极推行教育改革,满足家长多元化的的需求,希望把华夏的中文教育发展得更好。


    遗憾的是个别董事不断以各种手段,反对教改干扰学校正常运作。更令人震惊的是,昨天朱立竟然伪造公文私自发布“董事会决议”。校委会、家长会以负责任的态度告知全体家长,所谓的“董事会决议”,纯属朱立编造。上周日只有三位董事会成员坐下来与校委会家长会和BAC的代表开会,正如其他董事声明一样(see Board Member Statement below),当时根本没有人提出过朱力宣称的条款,没有任何讨论,更无任何投票。

    4月15日,由校章(5.03.7条)明文规定,并经3/25董事会全体会议一致认可的家长会投票委员依照现行校章的合法程序,通过公正、透明地投票产生的合法的结果 -117票赞成 180票反对,新校章草案被否决。 可朱立等个别董事,以非法的手段和程序,私自另搞投票,整个投票不透明无监督,并大量误导家长。这个非法的漏洞百出的投票结果被朱立等人利用,而真正合法的干干净净的投票结果却被他们无情的践踏。

    校委会、家长会以最大的克制,以最大的善意,按照大多数家长的意愿,一直努力希望通过协商解决问题,化解危机。但是朱立等人上周日又一次拒绝我们的建议。朱立更是伪造盗用董事会的名义私自宣布开始用大多数人反对的Limited Voting来举行选举,妄图用谎言和欺骗手段造成既成事实。这种做法不仅严重违法,更是对全体家长集体意志的藐视。这种为实现个人意志而不顾一切的行为如果不加以制止,会彻底将华夏纽约引向支离破碎的不归路。

    在朱立炮制的伪“董事会决议”里,更明目张胆地宣称学校将为其不法行为买单,妄想要学校支付其可能面对的法律惩戒费用。正因为其擅用职权,利用学校缺乏对其有效约束、制衡的手段,才为所欲为,藐视法律法规,置家长利益和学校长期利益于不顾。

    国有国法,校有校规。为了维护正义,保证学校正常运行,我们会通过法律途径坚决制止这种胡作非为的闹剧。希望大家能认识到法律行动是制止非法行为最有效的途径。相对于群众运动,法律行动也是对普通家长影响最小对学校运作干扰最少的方式。

    在保护学校安宁的同时,校委会、家长会向全体家长老师保证,不管学校政治方面如何混乱,我们会确保学校日常工作的正常运行。如果由于今年学校政治混乱而无法如期选举校长和家长会长,我们会继续尽职尽责地承担起学校运营的义务,直到学校合法选举产生新的领导团队。与此同时,我们还会积极推动学校选举的尽快进行,并努力促使重新启动校章修改工作。

    面对当前的乱象和僵局,我们更清醒地认识到,目前的新校章草案中关于学校管理架构方面的条款存在很大缺陷,如果按照新校章草案的规定,董事会权力将大大加强,全体家长对董事会的监督却被削弱,小团体只要在董事会占多数,就能进一步为所欲为,如果这一切都成为现实,公器为利欲熏心者所窃取,学校将一次又一次受到重创。

    恳请家长们认清形势,看清因果,在这个危机之秋,在道义上谴责某些人伪造撒谎无法无天的行径;在行动上支持校委会、家长会符合学校长期利益的决策。团结起来,保护学校。

    Admin and PTA



    Board Member Statement

    Mr. Zhu Li, Mr. Zheng Gutuan, Ms. Huang Ying, Mr. He Lida:

    This serves as formal notice informing you that, in your 05/07/2012 announcement attached below dated, you have not only fabricated the board meeting minutes, but more seriously you have fabricated the voting records for two of us (Shengjing Li and Ching Zhou.)

    We'd like to further clarify that, none of us had been informed by any of you, formally or informally, in any way, either before or after the votings you reported in the attached announcement. We were completely unaware of the so-called voting until seeing your announcement this morning.

    We therefore ask you to withdraw the announcement immediately.

    Respectfully

    HXNY Board of Directors:

    Minghui Lei, Shengjing Li, Ching Zhou
    05/07/2012
    Copyright © 2012 Huaxia Chinese School of New York, All rights reserved.
    You are receiving this email because your a member of Huaxia Chinese School of New York.
    Our address is:

    Huaxia Chinese School of New York
    P.O.Box 1236
    optional
    Scarsdale, NY 10583

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 朱立什么都敢造假,太无法无天了。

      Delete
    2. 他在投票箱里做文章有了经验。现在干脆来个编造。在违法的路上越走越远。

      Delete
    3. 看明白了。胡大棚/刘亚文就是要把学校搞乱,他们不用竞选就连任。

      这同去年李盛京任命自己为校长有何俩样?

      ==================

      如果由于今年学校政治混乱而无法如期选举校长和家长会长,我们会继续尽职尽责地承担起学校运营的义务,

      Delete
    4. this letter is a prank.

      Delete
  16. 新校章是纽约华夏建校以来,修改时间最长,修改幅度最大,家长参与最多,至今最完善 (尽管不完美)的校章。在我看来,此次修改的重点是还权于广大家长,包括家长对教材的选择权.

    新校章加强了董事会的权力,也增加了董事会的责任。最重要的是理顺了董事会,校长,家长会的治理结构 (governance structure) 。这就在根本上消除/减少了纽约华夏历此动乱有两个权力中心 (董事会,校长/家长会)的根源。

    同时新校章确认家长大会是学校的最高权力机构。在纽约华夏建校以来,首次赋予家长同时选举董事会,校长,家长会会长的全面权力。

    广大家长尽可通过选举自己心仪的董事会,行使对学校管理的权力, 包括对教材的选择权.

    胡大鹏极力反对新校章,就是害怕广大家长全面掌权, 他无法再为所欲为,利用纽约华夏的资源,为他的小圈子谋私利。

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What are the 私利 was Hu Dapen able to get for himself? Can you please give some example? Just because you're involved in the new bylaw process, it doesn't mean it's the best bylaw. Of course you think otherwise. That's called ignorance. The governance structure of the new bylaw didn't change the fact that the board, PC and the principal can disagree and still do the opposite. The bylaw didn't have any provision that would encourage the cooperation of these three offices. Your last sentence in the second paragraph and the third paragraph directly contradict each other. We can just stop there.

      Delete
    2. 修改时间长不等于好。BAC花了很长时间把Limited Voting打扮得冠冕堂皇,塞进Bylaw。口红涂得再多,猪也不能变成美女。

      Delete
    3. Agree. It is not a perfect Bylaw (particularly the controversial Limited Voting provision) but the best we have had so far.

      The biggest improvement in this Bylaw is that it streamlines the governance structure of the school and reiterates the ownership by parents.

      You can think the school as follows: Parents own HXNY. They hire (through election) the board to oversee the school and the principal/PTA to run the school. The principal and PTA report to the board.

      If parents are not happy with the status of the school or how the school is run. They can fire those they hired.

      It is not perfect but the best I can think of.

      With that said, a law is a law. There is no easy reinforcement mechanism in non-profit organizations such as HXNY. If people do not abide by it, it just a piece of paper.

      Delete
    4. By the way, the last paragraph has some truth to it. I view it as a cheap shot at an opponent during a political campaign.

      Delete
  17. +++++ 全面直选, 重振华夏 +++++

    May 8, 2012

    ================================================
    尊敬的各位家长,

    自去年5月以来,纽约华夏中文学校纠纷就一直没有停息,最近混乱越发升级。如不制止,势必影响学校正常运转,威胁学校未来。

    超过2/3的家长在最近校章投票中,表达了全部直选董事会、校长和家长会会长的愿望。我们所作所为都是为了承担家长赋予我们的责任,帮助实现广大家长的愿望,制止混乱,开启学校的新开端。

    为学校稳定和发展,作为董事会成员,我们特此声明:

    * 我们认为董事会、校长和家长会会长全部重新直选是结束当前学校混乱的唯一方法。拖延选举就是延续混乱。

    * 我们会维护学校教学环境,确保学校日常工作的正常运行。

    * 根据新校章,我们不容许任何人用任何借口,未经选举非法连任或自动成为董事。

    * 我们将维护和尊重家长们对学校管理的意愿和权力,包括对教材的选择权。我们鼓励下任当选的董事会、校长,根据我们中两位董事倡议的模拟注册的结果,开设马立平中文,美洲华语和标准中文。

    * 我们将竭尽全力通过校内协商解决问题,化解危机,不首先动用法律手段。但如果个别成员或小团体对任何学校志愿人员进行讼诉,我们将严阵以待。我们也敦促各位家长反对任何激化矛盾的做法。

    中文学校是全体家长的学校。在这里,我们呼吁和恳请各位家长支持并参加董事会、校长和家长会会长全部重新直选,积极报名参选。举行公开,公正,透明的学校普选,把票投给您所信任的家长,选出新的董事会,选出新的校长和家长会会长。让家长真正当家作主。请有意参选家长,在2012年5月20日晚11:59分前,把参选报名资料 - stating the position the candidate is seeking, along with a brief resume and the endorsement signatures of at least 2% of the voting members (17 members or more) - 寄至董事会(hxnyboard@googlegroups.com)。

    我们坚信,在中文学校人人平等,任何现在或以往的任职人员没有任何特权,更不能把广大家长的学校变相地变成自己的私有领地。

    尊敬的各位家长,我们的学校已经处在16年来最紧要的关头,请您为您的孩子,为我们学校的未来,支持并积极参加董事会、校长和家长会会长全部重新直选。


    纽约华夏中文学校董事会成员

    朱立、黄莺、郑顾团、贺力大

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Limited Voting 是直选?Liars and fraud, all four of you!

      Delete
    2. 直选 = 董事会、校长和家长会会长全部由全体家长直接选举

      Delete
    3. 举行公开,公正,透明的学校普选

      ----------------------------------------------

      还有脸说公开,公正,透明?直接把票箱抱回家选吧。

      Delete
    4. Anyone who submits their name for election will be making fun of themselves once the court order comes to say the new bylaw never passed. That you can count on.

      Delete
    5. I doubt if any sane person would come out run for anything in today's environment.

      Delete
    6. there will be insane people come out and run for something, you bet, and they are all supporters of ZHU LI. That's why ZHU LI pushed his agenda ahead with the fabricated the board decision. These insane people just want to get back the control over HXNY. They have been working towards this goal for the whole school year, and that is also the reason that they won't pull LV out of the new bylaws, just to make sure they can be guaranteed to get into board.

      Delete
  18. How about brainstorming some ideas on what to do from here? I suggest to lock everyone, including seven board, admin, pc, in a room from 9 in the morning on a Saturday and no one comes out until there's an agreed solution by everyone. Any other suggestion?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 大佬交易again?What good it has ever done to school?
      Court resolution is the only way out now.

      Delete
    2. There will be court injunction, but what after that?

      Delete
  19. Hi,

    I was teaching in HX and resigned last year because of the senseless fighting. Now I have a home classroom for my studnets. Our curriculum is based on an integrated approach to learning Chinese. Listening, speaking, and reading skills are emphasized, writing skills will be practiced through modern communication tools, such as email, text message... The textbooks that I have been developing based on National Foreign Language requirements with my long-time teaching experience and successful outcome. Our units are designed spirally so students will always be able to learn new things while review the previous learned contents. Our units on activities related to daily life are age-appropriate, practical and relevant. Each lesson is designed around themes such as family, food, travel, and games so that children can quickly gain useful communication skills. We will use lap top, I-Pod, I-Phone and Smart Board type of high-tech devices to do experiential activities to engage students. We will also play all sorts of games so students will learn Chinese in a fun and memorable way.Ample class time is devoted to students' communicative interaction in Chinese, providing opportunities to reinforce their listening and speaking skills. Supplemental materials, such as Youtube.com, Yuku.com, and Tudou Net…audio/visual aids are going to be used. Proficiency and performance are assessed periodically. Since I am a NYS certified teacher, some school even granted HS credits to my students in the past. I have a few spots available for next school year. If you are interested, please contact me: svep@optonline.net

    ReplyDelete