(一)
现在董事会还没有正式公布决议到底哪两队正式入选。等什么呢？
出线的两队候选人为什么这么没有自信？不敢让家长会放他们的竞选演讲录像？是怕家长们听到DAI说明年的工作重点之一是要花掉学校的储备金？是怕家长们听到CAO说华人在美国是二等公民？
在专业素养上，两位获选的校长候选人TIAN、DAI都是IT专家，但是没有任何学校管理经验。 而落选的校长候选人LIN则是专业教育工作者，大学终身教授，战略与组织管理专家，并曾从事体制改革实务。
获选的TIAN、DAI在去年以来群众运动极为活跃， 有时还是组织发起者。落选的LIN则从未参与过任何以往的运动，他的温和立场有目共睹。他的搭档YAO为人正直，朋友遍及校内持各种立场的人群。
获选的TIAN、DAI从未直接参与过教改，落选的LIN则在过去一年里，利用他在教育，组织管理和体制改革方面的专业知识，协助制定了一系列教改方案，参与引进马力平美洲华语教材，并在他代课的班级上推行他所倡导的教改措施，得到了家长和孩子的欢迎。
TIAN，DAI都给4董捐过款。LIN/YAO没捐过。2队捐过的出线，1队没捐的被封杀。这是巧合吗？四董要给大家讲清楚。因为献金而获得竞选资格。岂止如此。 DAI是去年弹劾董事的四家长之一。 如今四董告三董，却把去年的弹劾大将定为校长候选人，这在法庭上就是四董的罪证。事实上，选举法明确禁止候选人在投票现场搞任何形式的宣传。违法的选举过程，很可能导致选举结果无效。
（二）
LIN同志曾闯荡国内官场， 练就一口油腔滑调侃昏人的本事。他自称教育专家，可是只有空谈没有切实可行的计划。此人参与学校在data和评估上搞手脚，没有leadership，没有起码的良知，甘心充当HU/LIU的poster boy。他的帮派痕迹那么严重，竟然好意思说自己是中间派。
YAO同志自称中立，又看上去老实忠厚。为此他还真帮LIN同志拉了不少同情票。殊不知两个星期前，YAO同志就在弹吓朱董事长书上签名， 是少数几个最先签名的同志。
我们不反对教改， 我们反对借教改之名行私利搞浮夸打压分裂老师的做法。
长篇大论瞎JB扯蛋啊, 中文学校历任校长除HUANG外哪个是搞教育的. 你们把门坎设得挺高, 要教育家大学教授能侃得云山雾罩? 要华尔街金融家钱包鼓鼓轻易可以打得起官司?我们要的中文学校的校长, 是勤勤恳恳,任劳任怨,脚踏实地的普通家长,不是教授大款自认高人一等的伪上流.LIN的背景做个教务长合适, 应该比ZHANG强一点点. 如果LIN真想为学校服务, 你不一定非要坐在校长的位置. 非要当校长发挥你的特长你的动机值得怀疑.那些一心一意闹事的不多吧, WANG,XU还有开网站HU的狗头军师”Li Xing”. 你们费心挖了不少罪名, 就是借此想继续闹下去让学校开不了学! 想闹黄学校我们家长不参与!
（三）
学校现在就是帮派斗争, 一点不掩饰, 都他妈不是好鸟.DAI/CAO 4票---by四董.TIAN/SUN 4票---by四董. 四董搞出两对参选,比去年做的聪明一点. LIN/YAO 3票---by三董, 又要搞一对参选, 去年不是说明白两对比一对好吗?
HXNY has been making progress although many people are unhappy with the current still chaotic status.
ReplyDeleteLast year, the Board impeached the Principal; Board Chairman appointed himself as the Principal.
This year, the Board has not impeached or removed the Principal even though they are as equally frustrated with the Principal's refusal to give them the communication channel.
Last year, the Board filed lawsuit against the Principal. The Principal resigned and did not counter suit. No one know who was right in the end;
This year, the Board did not file lawsuit against the Principal until they were first suited by the Principal. The court will hear arguments from both sides on 6/22. Hopefully we will have a decision on who is right.
Last year, the Board gave one pair of candidates for parents to "choose" from first. They did not produce another pair until after repeated protests from parents.
This year, the Board gave two pairs of candidate for parents to "choose." There are still unhappy parents.
In 2013, what will happen?
There in no progress. The only difference is that they had 5 board members vs. 2 last year, and this year is 4:3. Had they had 5:2 this year, the Principal would have been long gone.
DeleteI would like to use a common statement to describe the current situation - irreconcilable difference.
Delete谁觉得自己有理又没法再让的才会先上法庭。去年今年都一样。
Delete去年5董就是不同意ZZ参选，没多想别的。事实证明他们决策正确。今年4董预谋卡人，自己帮派出两队，不让帮派外任何人参选。你说是进步还是退步？
2013年： 帮派彻底失败。HXNY成功修改Bylaws，实行民主选举，产生出代表大多数家长利益的董事会。动乱了两年的校园终于恢复平静。
去年5董就是不同意ZZ参选，没多想别的。事实证明他们决策正确。今年4董预谋卡人，自己帮派出两队，不让帮派外任何人参选。
Delete======
听听这话，除了疯子，说不出来。
去年5董就是不同意ZZ参选，没多想别的。事实证明他们决策正确。今年4董预谋卡人，自己帮派出两队，不让帮派外任何人参选。
Delete======
听听这话，除了疯子，说不出来。
-------------------------------
说对了吧？
致大棚校长书：
ReplyDelete大棚者，造以微薄之塑料，固附于钢架或木架之上。乃遮荫蔽阳，抗寒增温，档雨拒风之具。用于育苗植菜，物尽其用。若能广而推之，教书育人，则善莫大焉。
诚可惜，彼大棚非此大棚也。此大棚者：滥竽于华尔之街，诚实不足，欺瞒狡诈，言而无信，则多多有余。此大棚者：基于权钱之利，营私结党之邦。糊以“人不谋私利，不进董事，不连任校长”之纸。实乃纸糊大棚也。纸糊大棚，一经雨打，湿漉无力，再遇风吹，片片寸断。无力育苗，奈何教书育人否？
幸而育苗育人皆非吾帮之图。此大棚之真实功效，干预校章改革，再进董事，再控校长。合我胜京之力，辅以股看“无用”之计。掌控华夏，私校牟利。
纽约力胜京书
神马玩意儿，打回去重写。
Delete俺是个粗人，不懂法律，但是还是懂一点道理。俺对一些江湖传言谈谈俺的看法。
ReplyDelete1。董事的权力和董事会的权力
其实，董事作为个人，那怕你是几个人，也没有屁权力，你们说的话俺可以不听。只有董事会才有权力。俺们只听董事会决议，不听你的个人或帮派意见。
2。e-mail list
董事长或董事想向俺们传达个别董事的个人意见，实在没必要。因为俺们不想听也没必要听。再说了，董事长手里也有俺们大多数的伊妹儿地址。可是他净给俺们送一些骂校长的个人攻击的伊妹儿。俺都看不下去了。不知那法官大人能否看得下去不?
再说了，董事会的决议校长都给俺们发了。你还要发啥了?
3。黄董说匿名博客贴子影响学校。俺同意，因为那大多数是四董帮骂校长家长会长和他们的孩子的。咱也应该让法官大人看一看四董帮是怎么骂人的。
再说了，董事会的决议校长都给俺们发了。你还要发啥了?
Delete=========
楼上，胡大朋刘亚文已经把华夏放在法院手里了，你就别操心了。TRC里写的， 胡大朋刘亚文就别耍花招了。
朱力发给家长们的不是骂人的东西，就是以四董名义发的。跟些屁是的，放出来有屁用。
Delete世界上哪家公司的几个董事可以指手画脚，向全体员工发消息? 不全是以董事会的名义来发决议?
Delete看看四董，你们发的东西，有几个是决议? 任何人都可以置之不理。
周李雷三位真是不要脸了。去年几百家长要罢免他们。
Delete今年，多次（多少次？自己交待）以不参加董事会为手段让董事会不能形成决议，搞垮董事会。现在让美国法庭的临时禁强迫他们参加董事会。
还居然以不能形成董事会决议造谣惑众，诉讼。真是不要脸了。
你现在再弹劾三董试试看？能拿到几票？永远骗人不容易吧？
Delete低估华夏家长的智力了。 周李雷这三演员，就别自恋了。 雷董开学初在董事会上咆哮自己”至高无上“，演锝太精彩了，没人能忘。眼见为实。 周董，以前对不上号，物以稀为贵，目睹他的表演，现在终身难忘。
Delete四个字-其丑无比！
Delete民主是教改的最好保障
ReplyDelete四董预谋封杀林/姚候选人事件再次证明民主选举产生代表大多数家长意愿的董事会的重要性和必要性。按照学校创建者的初衷，华夏纽约由全体会员共同拥有。这个基本原则15年一直没变，至今仍是全体家长的共识。但是纽约州法（NPCL）赋予董事会极大的权力。如果董事会不是民主选举产生，不能代表大多数人的利益，“全体会员拥有”就是一句空话。即使有允许弹劾董事的条款，真正用起来要达到2/3多数是很困难的。怕被弹劾的董事也随时可以跑到法院去拿个禁止令，取消会员的弹劾权利。
有人认为5董去年能够成功阻止ZZ竞选并且没被弹劾掉，是因为得到了教改派的支持（见附件）。这个观点我现在完全同意。多数家长的需求是随时代进步而变化的。如果学校领导层是非民主方式产生的，就很可能陷入思想僵化，固步自封的怪圈。时间久了必然会产生矛盾。解决矛盾的办法也必然是爆发式的。要想避免这一年的悲剧重演，唯一办法就是用公平选举确保学校最高领导机构-董事会能够代表大多数家长的利益。
民主制度是解决矛盾的最好方法。公平的选举办法让所有选民不管是个人还是团体都能平等地表达意愿。选完之后大家心服口服，矛盾不再存在。HXNY多年不公平的选举，造成了一对一对的仇人，陈年往事至今仍纠缠不休，造就的领导层不可能也没能力领导学校向前走。新Bylaws里面提出的“限制性投票”（Limited Voting），也是不公平的选举办法。任何选举抱团的人本来就有优势，而“限制性投票”给小团体提供了额外的方便。这样选举结果不能服人，也无法解决矛盾。选出的董事会帮派林立，不能代表多数家长的利益。
民主制度能保证领导层循序渐进和与时俱进。如果`董事会由9位董事组成每年选3位，这首先能保证董事会多数董事有至少1年以上在董事会的工作经验，保证了学校政策的连续性。其次每年换3人能保证大多数家长的新要求，新想法能带进董事会（当然选举办法要保证代表多数人利益的候选人能当选，不能用“限制性投票”）。候选人为了争取选票，总要听取大家意见的。比如田，戴两队，很多人认为他们以前是反对教改的。现在为了当选，也都表示支持和继续实行教改。当选后他们是否能履行诺言我们不知道。在现行制度下，如果董事会支持，他们违背诺言大家也确实没办法。但如果董事会是民选的，今年选进去3个食言了没关系，明年选举可以再换3个。我相信多数出来竞选的人是出以公心，愿意听取大家意见为大家服务的。为个人或帮派利益出尔反尔的小人是极少数。这样即使已经在董事会里的人不听大多数家长的意见，每年进去的新人会把家长们的新思想，新要求带进董事会。类似于教改这样对多数家长有好处的事，应该在1，2年就会实现，而不是需要等4，5年。也减少了动用弹劾董事这种极端手段的必要性。
因此，建立一个在公平选举基础上的民主制度，确保董事会能代表多数家长的利益是解决学校领导层争端，保证学校平稳健康发展的唯一途径。
4/15校章投票引起的争端，绝不是董事会要不要民选的争执，而是用什么方法选的争执。在这个问题上，4董发再多的文件造谣诬蔑也没用。大鹏，亚文一向支持民主选举董事会，反对用“限制性投票方法“选举董事会。这个事实是谁都改不了的。“限制性投票”不是公平的投票方法，已遭到大多数家长的否决。这个事实也是谁都改不了的。
大鹏，亚文今年担任校长家长会长，领导学校启动了家长们要求多年的教改，一年下来初见成效。不管明年谁当校长家长会长，教改的成果明年将继续发展壮大。明年大鹏，亚文进入董事会，将会削弱帮派势力对董事会的控制，掌握修改Bylaws的主动权。相信他们会顺应家长们的愿望，领导学校修改出一部公平民主的新Bylaws。
出线的两队候选人为什么这么没有自信？不敢让家长会放他们的竞选演讲录像？是怕家长们听到戴扬说明年的工作重点之一是要花掉学校的储备金？是怕家长们听到曹亮说华人在美国是二等公民？连竞选演讲都不敢让选民看的人，怎么能领导学校走出危机？
ReplyDelete周日的董事会是公开会议，整个会议过程都属于公众信息。没到会的家长跟到会的家长有平等的知情权。PC 有责任也有权力把全部录像公开。这一点请双方咨询自己的律师，不要因为法庭TRO而忽略应尽的责任。
选民决定票投给谁，看的是候选人的一贯表现，而不是候选人在投票现场的表演。竞选期间，候选人过去的一切公众言行都有必要公开，让选民投票时有据可依，任何人不得帮助候选人隐瞒。真正公平的选举，在于投票前提供机会让选民充分了解候选人，通过当面或网上交流，问答互动的形式，让选民明白各个候选人政策的异同，素质的高下。华夏传统的在投票现场搞presentation的办法该停止了。事实上，选举法明确禁止候选人在投票现场搞任何形式的宣传。违法的选举过程，很可能导致选举结果无效。
林俊，洋洋洒洒一大篇，幸苦你了。再写你也是胡大鹏的跟屁虫，坏事做尽，家长们都看在眼里。我们为董事会的火眼金睛叫好！！！
DeleteHXNY Open Board Meeting Minutes
ReplyDeleteDate: Sunday, June 10, 2012
Time: 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM
Place:AAB 116
Participants: Sue Huang, Gutuan Zheng, Lida He, Ching Zhou, Shengjing Li, Minghui Lei, Li Zhu and some general members
Meeting Topics:
The Board received 4 nominations of 2012-2013 Principal/PC chair candidates by the deadline of 11:59PM Friday, June 8, 2012. The nominations are: Yang Dai (Principal)/Liang Cao (PC Chair); Jun Lin (Principal)/Dachun Yao (PC Chair); Chaochi Tien (Principal)/Michael Sun (PC Chair); and Tao Liang (principal)
All nominated candidates presented their working plans, followed by questions by each of 7 board members and answers by candidates.
Board members casted votes on the nominated candidates: Yang Dai/Liang Cao 4 votes; Jun Lin/Dachun Yao 3 votes; Chaochi Tien/Michael Sun 4 votes, and Tao Liang 3 votes.
Based on the voting result, the Board approved Yang Dai/Liang Cao and Chaochi Tien/Michael Sun as final candidates. The Board submits them for the June 17, 2012 election of the 2012-2013 HXNY Chinese School Principal and PC Chair.
Mr. Ching Zhou raised a motion "Given the ongoing litigation against the Chinese school, there's the potential conflict of interest in a board member’s decision to approve/disapprove the candidates and each board member should provide an explanation for their reasoning immediately after the voting” and the board voted 4:3 to reject the motion. The board agreed to issue explanations on its nominations afterwards.
Candidates' Presentation Videos
by HXNY Parent Council
Upon request from parents who were not able to attend the above Open Board Meeting on Sunday 6/10, Parent Council has recorded the presentation, the following videos were taped and published on school website here with presenter's permissions, other candidates prefer either not to publish their videos or defer until after 6/17.
Principal Candidate Jun Lin (Dr.林骏) paired with PC Chair Candidate Dachun Yao（Dr.姚大纯）；and Principal Candidate Liang Tao (梁涛)
The board agreed to issue explanations on its nominations afterwards.
Delete-----------------------------------------
给个日子好吗？
红太狼： 没用的东西！
DeleteYour honor:
DeleteI, Zhu Li, never played sneaky in this election. I just could not come up with a reason for why I voted for the two teams who donated money for my legal defense and I could not come up a reason for why I rejected the two teams who did not contribute money for my legal defense. But I was always being honest to the members. So after searching for explanations for three days, I told the members in the board meeting minutes that I would give them reasons afterwards. Excuse me? No, I still don't have it today. But today is still not the end of "afterwards". I promise you that I would give it to you and members of my school a good reason AFTERWARDS.
Your honor, I also could not explain why the two teams I chose would not want to let members to see the video of their presentations. Excuse me? Oh, yes, at least one team said they would show it afterwards. The other one? They said never. Yes, your honor, I agree with you, you can never say "never". Maybe they should have said "afterwards"?
Come on people, don't just stand there. Come out and defend our beloved Board Chairman. Nobody can help him to find a reason?
DeleteZAP 帮他编个理由?
Delete骂了一年5恶董现在是不是该骂4恶董啦?
Yang Dai/Liang Cao only want to have their presentation available after 6/17. After election? 真见不得人啊！
ReplyDeletehttp://hxcsny.org/page.php?28
红太狼： 没用的东西！
DeleteTwo pairs of Chickens! What a shame!!!
Delete经过懂事会精心筛选，幸存下来的候选人共有四个脑袋八条腿，请问幸存了几只兔子几只鸡？解题请提供详细步骤。
Delete四只鸡！兔子...不知道。好下流的问题...
Delete只有八条腿?
Delete离吧！过不好了，就别硬在一起。同意分开的请顶一下
ReplyDeleteding
Delete违法作弊的自己走。
Delete离？要离就净身出户。
Delete大鹏找我要庭外和解，我就告诉他要么无条件撤诉，要么等我搞得他家破人亡，老婆精神分裂。
用一句离婚常用语--irreconcilable differences
Delete大鹏找我要庭外和解，我就告诉他要么无条件撤诉，要么等我搞得他家破人亡，老婆精神分裂。
Delete-------------------------------
朱立说的？
上星期日已经看出有人快精神分裂了，有人拉火警，有人又哭又闹
Delete煮烂的鸭子一嘴硬。
Delete就是，胡大鹏潘清对着张兰大叫大骂，差点把张兰逼疯了。
Delete张澜要精神分裂了，一定要找Hu/Pan算帐！
Delete潘清先骂黄英，又骂张兰，疯了
Delete用一句离婚常用语--irreconcilable differences
ReplyDelete==================
湖大鹏流雅文，你们带人走吧，我们都烦死你们这二个骗子了！
朱力费了九牛二虎之力，要来了全校的e-mail address, 怎么到现在也不给发个对候选人筛选的解释啊?
ReplyDelete你不是最想与全体会员直接沟通了吗? 现在不能说别人不给你发伊妹儿了吗?
It is interesting that "朱力费了九牛二虎之力，要来了全校的e-mail address". Why should the board have to go to court to get the mailing list? I think the current Admin/PC were out of their mind. The court's decision shows that the mailing list has to be shared with the board, correct?
ReplyDeleteNot the "board", only the "four directors" in the board. They want it because they want to spread their own agenda.
DeleteHowever, as an individual board director or several board directors, they have no right to send their own agenda or opinion to members through official channel.
Only the "board" itself has the power, not individual director.
The four board members have been trying to use the e-mail addresses for their personal gains. Just look at what they have sent to members with their own collection of the e-mail addresses, most of them were personal attack and non factual statements.
DeleteSo, the majority of the board, 4 out of 7, or, the head of the board, cannot represent the board to ask for the mailing list of the members? Who made the judgement that the mailing list will be used for some private agenda? To me, Board, Admin, PC, each has its own rights and obligations for HXNY and overreaching is never a good thing for the whole community.
DeleteBoard has it obligation and right, but the power resides in the form of result ion of the board, not individual board member.
DeleteYou can blame if anyone refused to send the resolution of the board to members. You cannot blame anyone if he refuse to send some opinion of board members to anyone.
If Zhu Li wants to send something titled with "four board members", that's private agenda, not from the "board".
Lawyers for each sides take note because this will be highly likely asked by the judge in court.
DeleteMy question is: "Who made the judgement that the mailing list will be used for some private agenda? And then decide not to give the mailing list to the board?"
This is the exact reason in NY NPC and the Bylaws to define the quorum for a board meeting, to prevent it from making decision by some faction of the members.
DeleteAlthough four out of seven is a simple majority, it is not enough to have any decision at will. It is the law. Too bad. Go find the fifth board member to support you. Otherwise, you should just follow the law.
This is a better way to communicate. I believe everyone has to agree. My posts only have one objective, which is to show there is still optional way, peacefully, to reach some consensus.
DeleteDon't worry, most members have seen what Zhu Li sent to the members with their own collection of e-mail addresses. There is no judgement needed here, all facts!
DeleteIt is not about the way of communication. It is about the spirit of corporation, understanding and compromise. Without these, it doesn't matter how and what you can send to all members, things will not get better.
DeleteMeant cooperation,
DeleteFacts? Really?
DeleteThe board never got the mailing list before the court FORCED whoever to give them, right? The board, or, some board members, never get the chance to do anything using the list, right?
Good post.
Delete"It is not about the way of communication. It is about the spirit of . Without these, it doesn't matter how and what you can send to all members, things will not get better."
Without effective communication, we will never see "corporation, understanding and compromise" automatically happened!
What Zhu sent was addressed to all members, and he sent it probably 80% of the members with their database from last year. Anyone can see what his intension was with the list.
DeleteThat is not a good conclusion from a legal perspective. The TRO shows that the court might not take it like that at all.
DeleteTRO is not the legal conclusion. There was no presentation of facts and debate to get TRO. TRO MEANS NOTHING.
DeleteFirst, Calm down. "TRO MEANS NOTHING."?????? Better say that to the court!
DeleteI see how and why the communication failed in HXNY.
EOD for me.
TRO is based on the claims and complaints. That's why there is a "T" there. It has nothing to do with any conclusion.
Delete"To obtain a TRO, a plaintiff must prove four elements: (1) likelihood of success on the merits; (2) the extent to which the plaintiff is being irreparably harmed by the defendant's conduct; (3) the extent to which the defendant will suffer irreparable harm if the TRO issues; and (4) the public interest."
DeleteThe court never issues a TRO for nothing!!!
No facts finding process for TRO. People still has to follow the TRO, but not much to say at the end.
DeleteHe got the list, then what? It is actually a hot potato for him now, because he has to be very careful how to use that list. Everyone is watching every word he is going to send with that list.
He/They might use the list in a very careful way if got it well before the TRO too. Right?
DeleteNobody can be excused by any behavior that harms the smooth communication by legitimate parties among the community. So on this issue, to me, current Admin/PC, minus 1 point.
DeleteBoard is a party. Faction of board members, or individual board member is not a party. No individual board member has the right to communicate directly to all members through official channel.
DeleteIf you don't understand the difference between the "board" and the faction of the board, you are clueless. Chairman of the board doesn't have any power unless he can deliver a resolution of the board. That is called leadership.
Can a faction of PC or Admin, or any single number of admin team member use that list too?
DeleteWhy should the board have to go to court to get the mailing list?
ReplyDelete-------------
Good question! Another good question is why should the board have to go to court to get ZHOU, LI and LEI to attend the board meeting?
There are certain procedures to call a board meeting, with agenda, time, place, and certain time in advance.
DeleteThe four board members rarely follow the procedure, and always try to make decision on the run to benefit themselves. They have been acting without any decency.
Like the form of SVC, the four board members made the decision by themselves without a board meeting, and overturned the formal resolution by the Board. Everyone knows if it is legal. That's the decision of the four board members, not the "Board of Directors". There is a huge difference.
DeleteCan you blame anyone if he refuse to send the personal opinion of some board directors to al members?
周李雷三位真是不要脸了。去年几百家长要罢免他们。
ReplyDelete今年，多次（多少次？自己交待）以不参加董事会为手段让董事会不能形成决议，搞垮董事会。现在让美国法庭的临时禁强迫他们参加董事会。
还居然以不能形成董事会决议造谣惑众，诉讼。真是不要脸了。
-----------
顶
华夏的家长们去年为了王元饶了这三王八蛋，看看今年他们干的事。无辜不参加董事会，董事会为什么不开除他们？
华夏学校从去年闹到现在又回到法律诉讼上, 一年内美国总统都可以选完了, 我们联个校规都没有完成, 花了不少学校的午饭钱不说, 什么问题也没有解决. 去年胡大鹏的校长选举合不合法不说, 他表示一定以学校的利益为重, 凭心说, 他们学校工作干的还不错, 但是今年又来了个恶人先告状,又把学校带入危机. 一年完不成, 说明你们所有的人能力都有问题, 都没有以学校和学生的利益为重, 全他妈的该辞职. 那几个脸皮特厚, 特无廉耻感的李盛京, 周箐,雷明辉等就是学校动乱的根源. 在本职工作中找不到快感和高潮, 跑到中文学校来来捣乱,耍点淫威, 口口声声说辞, 到现在也没辞职. 我XXXX!
Delete尤发克 写于NY
話糙理不糙 呵呵
Delete看来这流氓大叔像是孙亦农.
Delete给周青这个至高无上的荣誉还差不多，我们都同意。就等着这个流氓大叔下台了。那一天一定要庆祝！
Deletehttp://hxnyforum.blogspot.com/2012/06/blog-post_14.html
ReplyDelete这一票投给谁？
董事会决议终于出来了。一切都很简单，有预谋的封杀，不需要理由。
6/17选举，我手中的一票到底该投给谁？投给开会拍桌子的田肇基吗？不能。投给爱跟人吵架，投票时故意冒领两张选票并跟投委会成员大吵大闹的孙亦农吗？不能。投给去年7/17弹劾5董发起人之一，工作重点为花掉学校储备金的戴扬吗？不能。投给自认华人是二等公民的曹亮吗？更不能。董事会强加给我们的这两队候选人，连自己竞选演说的录像都不敢让大家看，这种没有自信的人，不值得我们的信任
。
我很欣赏被封杀的候选人林骏（http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3df7JdYiMxU&feature=relmfu）的一句话：”独立人格，独立判断“。我要用自己的眼睛去看，这一年谁在困难的环境下踏踏实实地为学校做事？谁在处处找茬捣乱？我要用自己的耳朵去听，谁在为了学校利益苦口婆心地讲道理，以理服人？谁在胡搅蛮缠，明里暗里搞人身攻击？我要用自己的头脑独立判断：这一票到底该投给谁？
我也很欣赏被封杀的候选人姚大纯（ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Byl5FTwF0）的一句话：“堂堂正正做人”。虽然“民主”在HXNY不过是装饰，“HXNY为全体会员所拥有”不过是校章里的一句空话，虽然四董靠简单多数就能肆无忌惮地为报私仇而牺牲学校利益，有预谋地拒绝家长们选择校长家长会长的权利，使家长们手里只剩下一张可怜的，有名无实的选票，但是只要四董不用法庭禁止令阻止我领到这张选票，我就绝不会放弃。我要向姚大纯学习，用我手里的这张选票堂堂正正地表达我对四董的抗议，用我手里的这张选票堂堂正正地表达对我认为最合格的候选人的支持。我要在选票上堂堂正正地写上林骏，姚大纯的名字。虽然按照选举规定，我的票将会成为作废票，但我宁愿让它明明白白地作废，也不放弃我投下这一票的权利。
各位家长们，民心不可侮。我钦佩梁涛（http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAiv-p-RMug&feature=relmfu）的勇气。做为一位新家长，他为了学校的发展，为了家长们选择教材的权利，勇敢地走上竞选讲台，发表自己的意见。如果您也有自己的看法，请投下自己手里的一票表达意见。如果您还在犹豫，不知道这一票该投给谁，请您花一小时看看附件中列出的有关网站，相信您很快能得出自己独立的判断。为了让“HXNY为全体会员所拥有”早日成为现实，请不要浪费手中的这一票。
如果您认为林骏，姚大纯是校长家长会长最佳人选，请您在选票上写上他们的名字。
附件：有关网站
Delete1. http://hxcsny.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewforum.php?166
家长会关于修改校章的论坛。
2. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HXNYBylawsCom/messages
Bylaws Amendment Committee 论坛
3. http://go-hxny.blogspot.com
匿名论坛。人身攻击的言论多出于此。
4. http://hxnyexperiences.blogspot.com
家长博客。也有很多匿名评论。
这位造谣惑众真是不遗余力. 戴杨说了一句去年动乱的一个原因, 你硬给扣上人要花光学校经费的帽子. 曹亮说的意思是华人还没有入主流的事实,所以我们更要努力提高自己的声誉. 你欣赏谁没有错, 但你断章取义污蔑打击他人你心理太阴暗. 胡大鹏不也曾经大拍桌子大打出手?不也在自己家主办捐款酒会, 支助华人竞选进入主流社会? 胡大鹏能当校长作得还行, 别人还没上任就被你就不行了?
Delete林俊/姚大纯 are weak candidates by their presentation and/or Q&A in the open board meeting this past Sunday. 林俊 could not candidly answer the questions about his behavior within the current Admin team to show his integrity, i.e., ”独立人格，独立判断“; while 姚大纯 could not even talk clearly!
DeleteI like what the candidate 梁涛 presented during the open meeting---his motivation, experience and no-nonsense way to say it. Looks like he might have the leadership capability, which we need urgently, to lead HXNY out of the ongoing chaos.
DeleteIs there any way to put this guy 梁涛 back to the ballot?
I don't think this Liang Tao has any clue about what has happened in HXNY based on his presentation. 他除了介绍自己和喊喊口号，没一点实际的东西。
Delete去年动乱哪有一点和那钱有关? 戴杨毫无根据胡说八道，这么大的事找一个不着边际的理由。这种人能当校长? 见鬼了。
DeleteI do not agree with the post of "I don't think this Liang Tao has any clue about what has happened in HXNY based on his presentation. 他除了介绍自己和喊喊口号，没一点实际的东西。"
DeleteNo clue?
He might not know everything, at least he mentioned some conflicts, which shows that at least he is aware of some of the major issue.
Let's focus on the key issue here. Currently, HXNY does not lack anything to make the school running, but the leadership bringing the school out of the chaos.
钱的事是去年6/19选完校长才出来的。蔡晓笛要开自己学校缺钱，这帮人才闹着要分学校储备金。拿不到就闹着减学费。没看到朱立当上董事长第一件事就是提议减学费？反正他们看着钱多自己又不能用就不舒服，想办法折腾光了，也许就安心去晓笛学校了。
DeleteLeadership is backed up by power. Without power, where does the leadership come from? What power will a single person have at the school?
Delete中文学校除了教学教材需要改革, 体制改革更是急需. 作为非赢利单位, 法人问题, 储备金多少如何花都是要考虑的. 戴杨提到钱也是一种反思, 对学校长治久安更深层次的思考才是真正校长候选人, 才是教改的保证.
Delete要不是李建仁，朱立卡住脖子改Bylaws，体制改革早就解决了。
Delete如果朱李守规矩点，也不会闹到今天这步。即使他们硬要把Limited Voting写进Bylaws，表决的时候也不该做那些非法的动作。他们这些人，一向自以为聪明，不接受家长投票的裁决。去年弹劾李盛京没过，马上搞弹劾5董即为一例。
Delete是胡大朋刘亚文从头到尾百般阻碍Bylaws。
Delete争斗双方都难辞其咎。，相互指责不是解决问题的办法。也证明leadership的欠缺，communication skills 的缺失。
Delete戴杨的说法从另一个角度说明朱李帮是为分学校的钱而斗。
Delete改bylaws要2/3多数。李建仁发表声明要校委会家长会代表参与，而后又出尔反尔反对。从一开始朱力帮就没有打算以公正透明的程序来修改校章。投票时又用违法手段强行通过.
Delete朱李帮罪则难逃。
胡刘一开始就要参与，而不是阻碍，校章修改。朱李帮拒绝胡刘参与，胡刘为了大局让步。朱李帮不依不饶，继而气焰嚣张地再次否决了校委会家长会代表。
Delete这一切都表明胡刘从一开始就是顾全大局，积极参与和支持校章修改。是朱李帮蛮横霸道, 破坏团结合作修改校章。
我不清楚双方谈判的内幕。不管怎么样，违法的事不该做。该投票的事，谁也不能干扰。即使过去的事都不要提，现在该怎么办？两个主要问题：1.新Bylaws到底过没过？2. 6/17校长家长会长选举。
Delete1. 没什么好商量的，因为有个合法投票结果在那里，不能让几个头头随便就否了。只能说没过，明年再接着改。
2. 可以商量。现在的形势，即使戴扬上去也不敢把马力平美洲华语随便砍掉。不过是教改的步子慢一点而已。我不得不佩服的是，4董在TRO下还敢做得这么明显，这事弄到法庭上又多一条罪状。
如果双方这样达成共识，明年的形势跟今年掉个个。胡/刘在董事会占优势，主持改Bylaws。戴扬当校长。总的来说，我觉得胡/刘比较讲道理，也能团结人。我相信他们能把Bylaws改好。戴扬虽然能力未知，只要他按教改方案搞，林骏等人还是会帮助他，朱李帮也有人帮忙，学校开课应该没问题。胡/刘的支持者不是爱闹的人，也不会故意给戴扬找麻烦。这也许是条出路。
不过4董造假作弊把胡/刘逼上法庭，也该承担点责任。至少得给胡/刘出点律师费。李建仁也该承担责任。这也给后来人一个教训，大家做事都得守法，有矛盾按Bylaws办，不至于再闹到上法庭。
胡，刘把不附合于他们的同胞当敌人对待，告上法庭，就要承担后果。就是要学校付律师费。这也给后来人一个教训，大家做事都得守法，有矛盾按Bylaws办，不要动不动就上法庭。 少点reserve fund,也就断了某些人想把学校的钱来为自己的政治目的买单。
Delete胡/刘造假作弊多少，数都数不清。 来个恶人先告状。把华夏拖进了官司。
Delete胡/刘凭借着董事会那三董，今年一直给修改Bylaws捣乱，大家看得清清楚楚。
这胡/刘还做着自动进董事会的梦那。谁造假作弊，新校章是否通过，都得看法官大人的了。
胡/刘， 胆大包天，接着捣乱，接着骗。。。。。。 6/22 开庭就是下星期吧？
4董造假作弊把胡/刘逼上法庭
Delete---------------
胡/刘用五董告王元的同一个律师，来告四董。
胡/刘五恶董欺骗法庭，玩弄法庭，为了自己一己私利，不择手段。 美国的法官可不像这帮从来没上过法庭的“实干派”那么好骗，那么好说话。
Let's see what the court will say to those SVC techniques of voting today, continuing voting for two weeks, putting the ballot box at someone's home. Well, Zhu Li's lawyer already admitted at court that this process was tainted. Also Zhu Li's affidavit deliberately omitted one 7/17 settlement (that he was the signer) about last year's conflict, so we'll see what the court says about that. They tried to connect whatever happened this year to whatever happened last year, the fact is last year's affair was settled on 7/17, from a legal point of view. This year's mess was created single handedly by the 4/15 illegal voting by SVC and the subsequent actions of the four board members trying to implement the new bylaws by fiat and forgery. Nothing more, nothing less.
Delete断章取义? 他们把录像让大家看看就知道别人有没有断章取义了。为什么不敢放给大家看？
Delete===========================
这位造谣惑众真是不遗余力. 戴杨说了一句去年动乱的一个原因, 你硬给扣上人要花光学校经费的帽子. 曹亮说的意思是华人还没有入主流的事实,所以我们更要努力提高自己的声誉. 你欣赏谁没有错, 但你断章取义污蔑打击他人你心理太阴暗. 胡大鹏不也曾经大拍桌子大打出手?不也在自己家主办捐款酒会, 支助华人竞选进入主流社会? 胡大鹏能当校长作得还行, 别人还没上任就被你就不行了?
Is it possible to do that? I think it at least worth a try to " put this guy 梁涛 back to the ballot"!
ReplyDeleteI second this view--林俊/姚大纯 are weak candidates. Do not do "who is the least worst choice"!
ReplyDeleteTRO did not say other parents can not impeach them, only restrict Hu/Liu and three board members personally.
ReplyDeleteThe TRO did say the 4 board members have to perform their judiciary duty to school. Corruption is definitely against TRO.
戴杨：五千美金.
田肇基：五千美金.
These two are approved pincipal candidates by the 4 board members. The legal fund's bank records can tell the story.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
罪加一条：corruption!
==================================================
AnonymousMay 31, 2012 3:31 PM
同志们，朋友们：让 我们有钱出钱，有力出力，干到把胡大鹏刘雅文周清李盛京雷
明辉赶下台那一天， 正义的阳光一定会重新照耀华夏纽约的上空！
现在我们有足够的资金打赢这场官司。我们暂时不再接受一千元以下的捐款。 谢谢
同志们。
李建仁： 俩万美金。
郑固团：一万五千美金。
胡保年： 一万美金。
沈兆麟：八千美金。
刘伟/王硕：六千美金。
郑琦： 六千美金。
周爱平： 五千美金。
周英： 五千美金。
戴杨：五千美金。
田肇基：五千美金。
李晓京：五千美金。
BAC 成员每人承诺各捐款三千美金 (大部分已到帐)。
http://hxnyexperiences.blogspot.com/2012/05/blog-post_27.html#comment-form
HXNY Open Board Meeting Minutes
DeleteDate: Sunday, June 10, 2012
Time: 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM
Place:AAB 116
Participants: Sue Huang, Gutuan Zheng, Lida He, Ching Zhou, Shengjing Li, Minghui Lei, Li Zhu and some general members
Meeting Topics:
........
Mr. Ching Zhou raised a motion "Given the ongoing litigation against the Chinese school, there's the potential conflict of interest in a board member’s decision to approve/disapprove the candidates and each board member should provide an explanation for their reasoning immediately after the voting” and the board voted 4:3 to reject the motion. The board agreed to issue explanations on its nominations afterwards.
**********************************************
Your Honor:
I, Zhu Li, never played sneaky in this election. I just could not come up with a reason for why I voted for the two teams who donated money for my legal defense and I could not come up a reason for why I rejected the two teams who did not contribute money for my legal defense. But I was always being honest to the members. So after searching for explanations for three days, I told the members in the board meeting minutes that I would give them reasons afterwards. Excuse me? No, I still don't have it today. But today is still not the end of "afterwards". I promise you that I would give it to you and members of my school a good reason AFTERWARDS.
Your Honor, I also could not explain why the two teams I chose would not want to let members to see the video of their presentations. Excuse me? Oh, yes, at least one team said they would show it afterwards. The other one? They said never. Yes, your honor, I agree with you, you can never say "never". Maybe they should have said "afterwards"?
应把上面这段话送给法官看看。
DeleteSo who paid for HU/Liu's lawsuit against the 4 directors? Rumor is that some people donated money for that purpose too! Can somebody show the list of the people who donated to Hu/Liu?
Delete我要在选票上堂堂正正地写上林骏，姚大纯的名字。虽然按照选举规定，我的票将会成为作废票，但我宁愿让它明明白白地作废，也不放弃我投下这一票的权利。
ReplyDelete==========================================
I'll do the same, as a protest to the four board members! They are definitely breaching their judiciary duty to the school!
戴杨：五千美金.
ReplyDelete田肇基：五千美金.
==========
你们造谣也造得太离谱了。那个傻帽会让你知道银行里有几钱？你会吗？
这是傻帽们想告诉胡/刘，他们有的是钱，不怕和胡/刘打官司。
Deletehttp://hxnyexperiences.blogspot.com/2012/05/blog-post_22.html#comment-form
DeleteAnonymousMay 23, 2012 1:37 PM
胡刘，
正告你们，万万不可低估广大家长的能力。 不信 请看下面捐款。
李建仁和胡保年已郑重承诺每人各捐款一万美金。
郑固团已捐款八千美金。
郑琦已捐款五千美金。
晓京老师也承诺捐款五千美金。
BAC 成员每人承诺各捐款三千美金。
这次朱力和李建仁一定能战胜胡刘。
AnonymousMay 23, 2012 1:39 PM
我们郑重承诺：钱要多少捐多少。 只要能赢这场官司。
AnonymousMay 31, 2012 3:31 PM
Delete同志们，朋友们：让 我们有钱出钱，有力出力，干到把胡大鹏刘雅文周清李盛京雷
明辉赶下台那一天， 正义的阳光一定会重新照耀华夏纽约的上空！
现在我们有足够的资金打赢这场官司。我们暂时不再接受一千元以下的捐款。 谢谢
同志们。
李建仁： 俩万美金。
郑固团：一万五千美金。
胡保年： 一万美金。
沈兆麟：八千美金。
刘伟/王硕：六千美金。
郑琦： 六千美金。
周爱平： 五千美金。
周英： 五千美金。
戴杨：五千美金。
田肇基：五千美金。
李晓京：五千美金。
BAC 成员每人承诺各捐款三千美金 (大部分已到帐)。
http://hxnyexperiences.blogspot.com/2012/05/blog-post_27.html#comment-form
这个不像是造谣。除了他们帮派的人，别人还写不出这种口气。要说是吹牛还有可能。
Delete胡家邦的人真是不要脸，不要脸，算人吗？
Delete献金还满世界吹，这才是不要脸。
DeleteLet's see what the court will say to those SVC techniques of voting today, continuing voting for two weeks, putting the ballot box at someone's home. Well, Zhu Li's lawyer already admitted at court that this process was tainted. Also Zhu Li's affidavit deliberately omitted one 7/17 settlement (that he was the signer) about last year's conflict, so we'll see what the court says about that. They tried to connect whatever happened this year to whatever happened last year, the fact is last year's affair was settled on 7/17, from a legal point of view. This year's mess was created single handedly by the 4/15 illegal voting by SVC and the subsequent actions of the four board members trying to implement the new bylaws by fiat and forgery. Nothing more, nothing less.
ReplyDelete+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
One more thing the court will find out that TRO stopped HU to implement education reform that 342 to 76 members voted. Wait when the court find out Zhu Li withheld that crucial information about education reform vote. Court deserves the whole truth and they will punish those only telling half truth and even outright lies.
曹作军是不是脑子坏掉了？领头弹朱立？朱立这么帮他说话，还想让他做家长会长？恩将仇报，曹是什么人啊？
ReplyDelete请努力提高阅读理解水平。请再读n遍。
Delete朱力自掘坟墓。本来人们对他还抱一线希望。四董星期日的表现让中立家长彻底失望。
Delete曹作军作为家长会副会长，必须履行他对20%会员要求的职责。
Delete别装中立家长。
Delete是胡大朋刘亚文强迫学校用2010年的bylaw选。 四董赞成全面选举。 而且他们全都宣布过，不会参选。
为什么不去骂胡大朋刘亚文?
曹作军作为家长会副会长，必须履行他对20%会员要求的职责。
Delete-------------
曹作军替刘亚文背负TRO啦
四董赞成全面选举。 而且他们全都宣布过，不会参选。
Delete----------------------------------------
谎言。四董要用“限制性投票”选董事会。这种方法已经被4/15投票否决。
曹作军, 你怎么能做出这样的事？ 是不是有人威胁要告你啊？
Delete你不了解朱力吗？你怎么会帮着传播对朱利的诽谤谣言？
朱力去年没有被告上法庭，不是有人对他网开一面? 他闹得多欢啊。
ReplyDelete他那时回国了。不然还会逃得掉。
Delete不知朱力知不知道去年没有被告上法庭真相。如果知道，那他今年的表现说明他不是人。
Delete让人想起“农夫与蛇＂的故事。去年保他两次的人如今被咬，肯定肠子都悔青了。
Delete朱力真是比毒蛇还毒啊!
Delete就事论事。不要人身攻击！
Delete看看五恶董和胡大朋刘亚文，告人告上瘾了。
Delete这次没有被告到法庭的同胞们，赶快对这几位顶礼膜拜，谢谢他们没有把你告上法庭。
在华夏中文学校的网站上（http://hxcsny.org/page.php?28）可以看到被董事会封杀的校长会长候选人林骏/姚大纯的竞选演说。 应该说这是近几年华夏选举中最精彩的演说之一，在二十分钟里，两人提出了很多如何深化教改、构建交流平台、建设华夏社区的想法，但更令人印象深刻的是当他们娓娓讲述他们那些深思熟虑的方案时，他们明显的已经看到了自己无论如何努力也会被封杀的结局。 这个前景不但近乎残忍而且映透着几分惨烈，因为为了证明他们被封杀的合理性，林骏/姚大纯在会场上表现得越出色，在会场外就会遭受越多的谩骂诽谤、人身攻击， 但是他们还是出来参选了，他们依然认真地构想了施政方案，并平静地向大会做了精彩的阐述。 而他们的听众里就坐着那些下定决心要阻断他们的参选之路和那些在网上侮辱他们的人。这种飞蛾扑火式的举动是悲壮的，也是令人困惑的， 到底他们这么做是为了什么? 答案或许就在姚大纯演讲的最后一分钟，“我爱华夏”。 这是一种“虽千万人吾往矣”的英雄气概， 这是一种“成功不必在我”的志愿者精神， 他们只希望将他们的想法植入人心，在某一天由某一个人将它实现。 我来了，我尽力了，我无怨无悔。
ReplyDelete同样值得肯定的是，田肇基/孙亦龙， 戴扬/曹亮在学校这种混乱局面下出来参选，他们也拥有着令人赞赏的勇气。 但让人不解的是他们有勇气参选， 却不敢授权PTA立即公布他们的竞选演说录像， 推说以后再发布，或者说大家6/17选举日来看我的现场演说吧。 这好像在说我这次没演好，这次不算，让我准备准备，再演一次吧。 董事会更是免战高悬，拒不理睬家长要求他们解释原因的声浪。 在去年的选举中，当时的董事会也面临同样的责难， 但那时的董事会尚且敢于在全校大会上作出说明。 如果在6/17日前家长依然看不到所有的录像，那么我们希望在当天的大会上，请没有公布录像的候选人解释原因，也请董事会成员宣布他们所选择的候选人以及理由。 可能有的人只是想把事情拖到选举尘埃落地， 那时也就无人关心这些事了。 可是这样躲避畏缩、瞒天过海只会招致更多的非议； 而一个真正有风骨的精英， 一个真正有信仰的斗士，宁愿为人咒骂，不愿遭人鄙视。
看过林骏/姚大纯的竞选演说后突然觉得或许最终校长会长是谁已经不再重要了， 要想把华夏办成百年老店，依靠的不是某一位校长会长的丰功伟绩， 而是印证在林/姚身上的那种华夏经久不衰的志愿者精神， 如果有更多的人在看过他们的演说后，能够同样不计个人得失，以各种方式服务华夏，那么华夏虽历经风雨也必能浴火重生， 这， 也就是对林骏/姚大纯， 这队华夏选举史上最成功的落选人的最佳回报。
ding!
Delete好文章！
Delete刻意美化林/姚的表现，没必要！精彩？没觉得。
Delete顶！挫子里面拨将军！呵呵
Delete林/姚出来是出于对华夏的爱。另两对出来是出于帮派的恨。
Delete林/姚出来是出于对华夏的爱。另两对出来是出于帮派的恨。
Delete--------------
你凭什么说这话？
在田默默无闻熬夜为学校工作时，你们在哪里？
妄下断语！脑子进水了！呵呵
DeleteAll 4 candidates went for election based on loving HX!
ReplyDeleteDing
Delete朱李帮早就憋着劲要上法庭。 所以他们就可着劲的闹，逼着上法庭。 看看他们朱李帮的人是怎么叫嚣的吧：
ReplyDelete－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
AnonymousMay 1, 2012 10:17 PM
去年也是朱立违法。只可惜今年董事会四人帮不够quorum.董事会quorum是五。去年五董的决议是够quorum的，是代表董事会的。今年董事会四人帮只能冒充代表董事会。从去年到现在，违法的是同一帮人。
====
再嚷嚷也是白搭。有种上法庭。不久什么都解决了吗？
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
AnonymousMay 2, 2012 7:12 PM
董事会四人帮：朱立，黄莺，贺力大和郑固团。他们为什么怕上法庭？
AnonymousMay 2, 2012 8:30 PM
他们不怕。怕的是胡/刘/李/雷/周。去告啊。干说不练。
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
AnonymousApr 30, 2012 07:33 PM
Dapeng Hu. We are waiting for you to go to court. Go.
你不去是孙子。还有你们：李盛京，周菁，雷明辉，张明宝，刘雅文。
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
摘自 http://go-hxny.blogspot.com/
有恃无恐。
Delete朱李邦? 那么你属于哪邦？传说中的胡刘邦吗？就是说承认目前华夏进行的是邦派之争了
ReplyDelete。
这个帖子的语气和形式，与文革时的大字报有何区别？只要是邦派之争，任何一方都难言清白。相互指责，解气但无法解决实际问题，也无助于营造一个利于解决问题的环境。
要么省省口舌，等待法庭审判；要么冷静下来，寻求解决之道！不要继续污染这块本应清静的孩子学习的静土！
HXNY只有朱李帮，没有别的帮。现在的矛盾是朱李帮和大多数家长的矛盾。哪天朱李帮不闹事了，学校就安静了。
Delete陷入争端的任何一方都不配作为所谓多数家长的代表！
Delete众所周知，只有朱李帮的人特会闹，而且是不达目的誓不罢休的那种闹。只要你胆敢站出来，那怕是说一句不同意他们的话，你马上会被恶毒攻击。
Delete朱李帮是中文学校的毒瘤。
学校中哪一次闹事不是朱李帮挑起的？他们闹事，别人就都要让路吗？
Delete是朱李帮继续污染这块本应清静的孩子学习的静土！连一个一心想教育的人都不让出来竞选，让两对闹将出来竞选，这不是继续污染这块本应清静的孩子学习的静土是什么？
连都不让出来竞选，让两对闹将出来竞选，这不是继续污染这块本应清静的孩子学习的静土是什么？
DeleteI do not get it. Show us what did "一个一心想教育的人" do in this chaos?
Come on. You cannot possibly wanna put a person suspicious of integrity at the post of principal. Learn the lesson from the past! My fellow parents!
Take some time to find other reasons to support Jun/Yao. Maybe, better spoken Chinese than other candidates?
Delete一心想教育的人没参加打斗，就更说明他在一心想教育。
DeleteU R Really Naive!
Delete一个不敢主持正义的林绝对不能做校长！！！
DeleteSo who paid for HU/Liu's lawsuit against the 4 directors? Rumor is that some people donated money for that purpose too! Can somebody show the list of the people who donated to Hu/Liu?
ReplyDeleteSo you confirm Dai and Tian donated money to Zhu Li?
Delete五十步笑百步？
Delete捐款没有错。但如果挑候选人只挑捐过款的人，就要去法官那里说清楚了。
Delete同样值得肯定的是，田肇基/孙亦龙， 戴扬/曹亮在学校这种混乱局面下出来参选，他们也拥有着令人赞赏的勇气。 但让人不解的是他们有勇气参选， 却不敢授权PTA立即公布他们的竞选演说录像， 推说以后再发布，或者说大家6/17选举日来看我的现场演说吧。 这好像在说我这次没演好，这次不算，让我准备准备，再演一次吧。 董事会更是免战高悬，拒不理睬家长要求他们解释原因的声浪。 在去年的选举中，当时的董事会也面临同样的责难， 但那时的董事会尚且敢于在全校大会上作出说明。 如果在6/17日前家长依然看不到所有的录像，那么我们希望在当天的大会上，请没有公布录像的候选人解释原因，也请董事会成员宣布他们所选择的候选人以及理由。 可能有的人只是想把事情拖到选举尘埃落地， 那时也就无人关心这些事了。 可是这样躲避畏缩、瞒天过海只会招致更多的非议； 而一个真正有风骨的精英， 一个真正有信仰的斗士，宁愿为人咒骂，不愿遭人鄙视。
ReplyDeleteWhy we impeach Zhu Li:
ReplyDeleteHere is my two quick cents. In many people's mind inclduing mine, Zhu, Li is being impeached because he, as the chairman of the board, has failed
miserably. Just look at the curent state of the chinese school, as the leader of the school, he has to take the responsibility. He needs to know
it, loud and clear.
If I were him, I would resign, together with the rest of the board (indeed, the baord is totally disfunctional, who needs it except themselves).
This has nothing to do with the By-law, it is simply the right thing to do as a decent member of the community. If the situation gets out of hand
on your watch, you need to go, as simple as that.
In time of crisis, good leaders show their quality by rising above the fray and leading people out of the difficult situation. Unfortunately such leadership does not exist in the Board. We are sinking deeper and deeper into chaos. It's obvious to everyone that the Board had failed its fiduciary duty and Zhu Li, as Board Chairman, should bear the main responsibilities.
DeleteNo good leadership at the other side as well.
DeleteTotally lack of leadership is the root reason for this chaos. All the involved parties , including the board, should share the blame.
DeleteToo bad they are all obsessed with this kind of "my side vs. your side" thinking and forgot the best interests of the school.
Delete只要陷入幫派爭鬥，結局一定是忽視集體利益而制維護幫派利益。
Delete華夏如今的亂局，不影響教學是不客觀的。應當感謝老師們依然堅持教學。譴責所有不遺餘力進行幫派爭鬥的人！
退一步海闊天空！不要再讓華夏陷入再次分裂的危局之中！
God bless HXNY!
说空话没用。真的想解决问题的说出怎么解决法。
DeleteIf you guys cannot figure out, go the fxxk away. Let other willing people try.
DeleteDing! Some guys have PHDs but really is "Permanent Head Damaged"!!!
DeleteU R ALL Really Naive!
DeleteBased on the same logic, Hu/Liu, should resign.
DeleteWe think all Board members and Hu/Liu all should resign and return the school back to orinary parents. Period!
Delete100% agree
ReplyDelete按照选举法，田/戴不能在投票现场演讲拉票。董事会不能知法犯法。
ReplyDelete按照选举法，田/戴不能在投票现场演讲拉票。董事会不能知法犯法。
ReplyDelete============
那家的选举法？
华夏历来这样选举，今年为什么不行了？
Buffer Zones
DeleteMost states have buffer zones outside of polling places. Generally, this is 100 feet from the entrance of the polling place.
Inside the buffer zone you are prohibited from blocking the entrance, interfering with voters or doing any kind of campaigning or canvassing. The buffer zone at individual polling stations may be marked with an official demarcation such as a chalk line or a rope. You may also know where the buffer zone begins and ends by where people holding signs are congregating. Violating the buffer zone may make you guilty of voter intimidation.
Read more: Polling Station Rules | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/list_7272082_polling-station-rules.html#ixzz1sAIHPgzk
那家的选举法？
Delete华夏历来这样选举，今年为什么不行了？
----------------------------------------
历来如此是因为不知法，现在不能知法犯法。
That's for state election. Each state or organization can make its own law/rule for its own election.
DeleteExactly. Make sure you understand what you are talking about before making any statements.
Delete胡大打们终于理解我们去年的心情, 要弹核了. 中国人的地方还是要靠群众运动,诉讼实在解不了现在心中一口恶气,胡大打反正没有信用没有必要坚守许诺.
ReplyDelete校委会家委会行动起来又开始拉票了, 但是胡大打们不要高兴太早. 这次和上次不完全一样, 你的一举一动都要在法庭上解释清楚.
They are violated the TRO. Hu/Liu/Zhou/Li/Lei are aware of and support Liang Wang and Ming Xu and Zuojun Cao's action. We are sure all of their spouses are among the 185 signatures. To against the Judge will directly put themselves into the Jail Cell!!!
Delete造谣！
DeleteThere are 7 board members which should yield a total of 14 votes if all of them voted for 2 pairs. Clearly,the three board members Li/Zhou/Lei,only voted for one pair, just like last year.
ReplyDeleteNo.
DeleteThe 3 directors voted for Lin/Yao and Tao Liang.The other 4 voted for Tian and Dai.
Tao Liang does not have a partner. It is against bylaw. Where is the "good faith"?
DeleteThey voted for only one pair. The following is their statement
DeleteStatement from Minghui Lei
华夏在目前的特殊情况下，需要温和,中立,冷静的领导者，把学校带出困境。学校更需要有专业和有经验的人，继续教育改革和提高教育质量,使学校的持续稳定发展.无论从专业素质, 演讲水平, 还是从处事理念及解决问题的方法, 林骏/姚大纯是最好的候选人. 这是为什么我投他们的票.同时，感谢所有候选人愿意站出来为学校服务.
Minghui Lei
-------------------------
Statement from Shengjing LI
Over the past year, Professor Jun Lin has played a leading role for the successful school education reform, which is supported by the majority of HXNY members. Jun leveraged his expertise on reform management and teaching experience to establish the education evaluation system for the school.
Based on the tracking records and the working plans presented at the board meeting, there is no doubt that Lin/Yao is the best team candidate to lead the school for the continuous education quality improvement in the next school year. As an entrusted board director, I vote on the best interest of all children in our school.
Other than that, I’d like to express my appreciations to all candidates for their willingness to serve our school as volunteers.
Thanks,
Shengjing
---------------------
Statement from Ching Zhou
"My long stated vision for a better hxny are 1) productive learning, 2) responsive governance, 3) inclusive community.
To reach that, I look for following qualities in potential leaders: a) leadership, b) credentials a/o professionalism, c) uniting power.
Along these lines, the choice is obvious for an unbiased eye, the Lin/Yao team is the best fit for Today's HXNY. Both are relatively new to the school with little burdens of past, Professor Lin understands corporate governance, and as a reform expert has played a leading role in the long-waited popular education reform at HXNY this year that includes not only giving members choices in textbooks, but also introducing a systematic (teaching/learning) evaluation methodology. He's in the best position to advance the education reform at HXNY that has already seen substantial impact on our children and will certainly be crucial for the future success of our school.
I appreciate all candidates for their willness to serve the school.
As a HXNY stakeholder and as a board member entrusted to work for the best interest of all our children, I don't believe HXNY can afford to be lead by controversial figures at this time.
Thanks
ching
Really? So, where did the 3 votes MR.Tao liang get ? Obviously, they were from the 3 directors, Lei Li and Zhou. The 3 directors do not have the guts to recognize what they did?
Delete周庆，雷鸣会，李盛京又一次违反了BYLAW！BYLAW要求他们选一对，他们选了梁涛。而梁是不合格的，于是要是周雷李得逞，他们又只送一对侯选人给家长们选择。
DeleteThere are 7 board members which should yield a total of 14 votes if all of them voted for 2 pairs. Clearly,the three board members Li/Zhou/Lei,only voted for one pair, just like last year.
ReplyDelete--------------
Li, Lei,Zhou did this again? one pair?
These three SOBs are the root cause of HXNY's turmoil.
DeleteAgain, Li, Zhou and Lei violated the bylaw and voted a single person and only give us one pair as last year. If they are the majority, we will only have one pair again. Where is the "Good Faith"? Please tell the court.
Delete